The Modified Cognitive Constructions Coding System: Reliability and Validity Assessments

Moran, Galia S.; Diamond, Gary M.

doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01620.x

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

(27 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The demarcation of text segments was itself nontrivial because it was driven by an effort to identify functional units—in the terms of the posited task processes—to shifts in the cognitive work (cf. Garrison, Cleveland-Innes, Koole, & Kappelman, 2006; Moran & Diamond, 2006).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making

Hartmann

McLaughlin

2018

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes the context of ethical decision making in research and suggests that direct attention to the ways in which decisions are actually made in such environments is needed. A decision-making model based on the literature on heuristic processing is proposed and is followed by a review of the method, data, and results of the authors' research on this model. The implications of the research are developed, and a research agenda is outlined. Key findings were that competent actors do indeed process ethics problems heuristically and in ways that interweave intuitive, affective, and more rational phases. This processing does not typically follow a simple progressive pattern but evidences a sort of trial-anderror processing that is consistent with the logic of heuristic processing more generally. Finally, while diverse, participantlevel processing attempts appear to follow patterns which are associated with the experience and training of the actors.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making

Hartmann

McLaughlin

2018

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Causality Axis. Causality is frequently presented as one of the central components of structure and of narrative changes (Friedlander & Heatherington, 1998;Moran & Diamond, 2006;Sequeira, 2004;Sequeira, & Alarcão, 2009), although it is not universally recognized as a constitutive element of narrative (Rimmon-Kenan, cesses (functional and dysfunctional) about the several aspects related to problems and their maintenance.…”

Section: Telling Of the Story-in Storiesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Assessment System of Narrative Change

Sequeira¹,

Alarcão²

2013

Journal of Systemic Therapies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Different schools of family and couples therapy understand and promote change differently. First-order therapeutic models assume that change should happen in communication and interaction. Second-order therapies focus on narrative transformations that promote and reflect epistemological and functional changes in interpersonal and intrapersonal aspects. For this reason, second-order therapies are more focused on the way change occurs in client constructions, stories, attributions, and perspectives on problems and solutions (Friedlander & Heatherington, 1998;Gurman, Kniskern, & Pinsof, 1986).Narratives are "stories in discourse formats with a sequential order that connect events in a significant way, in relation to an audience and that favors visions about the world and about intervenient experiences" (Hinchman & Hinchman, 1997, as cited in Elliott, 2005 3). Speech, time, and the coherence and meaning of the stories are central assumptions about the key narrative functions: intelligibility and significance. They are constructed through language negotiation between subjects in relation to each other. Life narratives can also be condensations and abstractions that contain parts of events and circumstances that people experience. Many events occur every day in our lives, but only some of them are storied and given meaning

show abstract

Coding Ethical Decision-Making in Research

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents methods and challenges attendant on the use of protocol analysis to develop a model of heuristic processing applied to research ethics. Participants are exposed to ethically complex scenarios and asked to verbalize their thoughts as they formulate a requested decision. The model identifies functional parts of the decision-making task: interpretation, retrieval, judgment and editing and seeks to reliably code participant verbalizations to those tasks as well as to a set of cognitive tools generally useful in such work. Important difficulties in the reliability and external validity of measurement are evaluated and a small set of illustrative data is used in support of that discussion. Results indicate that both intuitive emotional but also more deliberative cognition is present which is consistent with work in related literatures in expertise and in neuropsychology. Finally, the theoretical and practical potential of the approach is elaborated, particularly through links to a framing in Aristotelian ethics.

show abstract

The Modified Cognitive Constructions Coding System: Reliability and Validity Assessments

Cited by 6 publications

References 27 publications

Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making

Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making

Assessment System of Narrative Change

Coding Ethical Decision-Making in Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About