1983
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0033867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modulation of neurotransmitter release at synaptic junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 418 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of inhibition potency was w-agatoxin IVA (IC50, 5 nM) > wconotoxin MVIIC t sFTX (IC50, 2000 FM). The inhibitions were reversible, surmountable by conditions that facilitate Caa2+ influx and very much like that produced by a deficiency of Ca2+ (Mallart & Martin, 1968;Erulkar, 1983 (Luebke, Dunlap & Turner, 1993;Takahashi & Momiyama, 1993;Turner, Adams & Dunlap, 1993;Regehr & Mintz, 1994). w)-Conotoxin GVIA, an N-type channel blocker, inhibits ACh release slightly at high concentrations (Hong, Tsuji & Chang, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The order of inhibition potency was w-agatoxin IVA (IC50, 5 nM) > wconotoxin MVIIC t sFTX (IC50, 2000 FM). The inhibitions were reversible, surmountable by conditions that facilitate Caa2+ influx and very much like that produced by a deficiency of Ca2+ (Mallart & Martin, 1968;Erulkar, 1983 (Luebke, Dunlap & Turner, 1993;Takahashi & Momiyama, 1993;Turner, Adams & Dunlap, 1993;Regehr & Mintz, 1994). w)-Conotoxin GVIA, an N-type channel blocker, inhibits ACh release slightly at high concentrations (Hong, Tsuji & Chang, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When the LOT of slices of olfactory cortex are stimulated twice in rapid succession, the response evoked by the second test stimulus is greater than that evoked by the first conditioning stimulus (Richards, 1972;Bower & Haberly, 1986). Such synaptic facilitation occurs at a number of sites in the CNS (Andersen, 1960a, b;Eccles et al, 1961; Kuno & Weakly, 1972;Erulker, 1983) and is usually considered to reflect a presynaptic phenomenon involving an increase in transmitter release caused by the persistence of calcium activity triggered by the conditioning stimulus (Katz & Miledi, 1968). However, when transmitter release is high there is a simultaneous underlying reduction in the response to the test stimulus probably caused by depletion of transmitter stores by the conditioning pulse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), is not a constant process. Rather it is subject to stochastic fluctuations (2,3), periodic oscillations (4,5), and intrinsic and extrinsic modulation (6)(7)(8)(9). A growing body of evidence suggests that much of the flexibility in synaptic function is achieved by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of key protein molecules (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%