2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2007.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The molecular basis of cross-reactivity in the Australian Snake Venom Detection Kit (SVDK)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[82]), gauge their relative toxicity in different animal models, and more accurately assess the potential danger of these snakes to human bite victims. Alongside proteomic characterisation, it is important that the extent and basis of any cross-reactivity of these venoms with currently available antivenoms and the snake venom detection kit (SVDK) [110] be ascertained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[82]), gauge their relative toxicity in different animal models, and more accurately assess the potential danger of these snakes to human bite victims. Alongside proteomic characterisation, it is important that the extent and basis of any cross-reactivity of these venoms with currently available antivenoms and the snake venom detection kit (SVDK) [110] be ascertained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…False negatives may still arise because of a hook effect that occurs when a high venom concentration results in saturation of the binding antibodies in the kit, preventing formation of a sandwich. The labelled conjugate is removed in the washing step, resulting in a negative result 1,8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labelled conjugate is removed in the washing step, resulting in a negative result. 1,8 Venom levels below the detection limit of the test may also result in a false negative, because of subclinical envenomation that may or may not subsequently require antivenom therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia it is a useful test but its relative insensitivity, high levels of false positive results [5] and problems relating to cross reactivity [40,41] compared with the standard EIA also leave a lot to be desired although, as stated above, the new assay is more sensitive. It was concluded [42] that the SVDK may assist in regions where the range of medically-important snakes is too broad to permit the use of monospecific antivenoms.…”
Section: Major Roles Of Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa) mentioning
confidence: 99%