2019
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Molecular Basis of Viral Inhibition of IRF- and STAT-Dependent Immune Responses

Abstract: The antiviral innate immunity is the first line of host defense against virus infections. In mammalian cells, viral infections initiate the expression of interferons (IFNs) in the host that in turn activate an antiviral defense program to restrict viral replications by induction of IFN stimulated genes (ISGs), which are largely regulated by the IFN-regulatory factor (IRF) family and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family transcription factors. The mechanisms of action of IRFs and STATs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
3
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, IRF3 has been found to be targeted by several different classes of viruses. Paramyxoviruses, herpesviruses, reovirus and double stranded RNA viruses, to cite some examples, have been shown to interfere with IRF3 signalling through different strategies [65]. These include the control of protein expression, protein cellular localisation, modifications of the PTMs, inhibition of protein-protein interactions or induced cellular degradation [10].…”
Section: Irf3 Tab1 and Nlrp12 Are Important Components That Drive Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, IRF3 has been found to be targeted by several different classes of viruses. Paramyxoviruses, herpesviruses, reovirus and double stranded RNA viruses, to cite some examples, have been shown to interfere with IRF3 signalling through different strategies [65]. These include the control of protein expression, protein cellular localisation, modifications of the PTMs, inhibition of protein-protein interactions or induced cellular degradation [10].…”
Section: Irf3 Tab1 and Nlrp12 Are Important Components That Drive Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcription factors Not unexpectedlyand speaking again to validation of the consensomes -the strongest and most significant CoV HCT intersections were observed for HCTs for known transcription factor mediators of the transcriptional response to CoV infection, including members of the NFκB (q-value ranges: SARS1, 1e-7-1e-9; SARS2, 9e-3-2e-3; MERS, 1e-3-1e-4) [33][34][35] , IRF (q-value ranges: SARS1, 2e-2-1e-31; SARS2, 2e-4-1e-17; MERS, 9e-4-7e-5) 36 and STAT (q-value ranges: SARS1, 1e-7-1e-55; SARS2, 2e-3-3e-29; MERS, 5e-2-3e-5) 37-39 transcription factor families ( Fig. 3).…”
Section: To Illuminate Human Signaling Pathways Orchestrating the Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRF2 and IRF4 have been implicated in the suppression of type I IFN signaling. [43,44]. IRF-4 and ZNF148 TF are involved in Epstein -Barr virus (EBV) infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%