2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.11.2277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Molecular Mechanism of Domain Swapping of the C-Terminal Domain of the SARS-Coronavirus Main Protease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(124 reference statements)
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall order of helix packing (α1 structuring early followed by α4 with α5 forming last) is similar to the order of helix stabilities seen in NMR spectroscopy studies of SARS-1 M pro C . Thus, the folding of SARS-2 M pro C seen in simulations is similar to that of SARS-1 M pro C as seen in both simulations and experiments. , Specifically, both SARS-1 M pro C and SARS-2 M pro C fold cooperatively, and there is an order to the α-helix formation potentially due to a difference in the helix stabilities. , It has previously been shown that a self-peptide containing the folding nucleus (residues that gain structure early during folding) of ubiquitin can modulate its folding by replacing ubiquitin’s own nucleus . Since SARS-2 M pro C has localized early structure formation (Figure E), akin to a polarized folding nucleus, , we tested if self-peptides of SARS-2 M pro C could insert into the whole protein during folding similar to ubiquitin.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The overall order of helix packing (α1 structuring early followed by α4 with α5 forming last) is similar to the order of helix stabilities seen in NMR spectroscopy studies of SARS-1 M pro C . Thus, the folding of SARS-2 M pro C seen in simulations is similar to that of SARS-1 M pro C as seen in both simulations and experiments. , Specifically, both SARS-1 M pro C and SARS-2 M pro C fold cooperatively, and there is an order to the α-helix formation potentially due to a difference in the helix stabilities. , It has previously been shown that a self-peptide containing the folding nucleus (residues that gain structure early during folding) of ubiquitin can modulate its folding by replacing ubiquitin’s own nucleus . Since SARS-2 M pro C has localized early structure formation (Figure E), akin to a polarized folding nucleus, , we tested if self-peptides of SARS-2 M pro C could insert into the whole protein during folding similar to ubiquitin.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…SARS-2 M pro C (Figure A,B) is structurally similar to SARS-1 M pro C with their sequences differing only at 4 residues (Figure S1). Although little residue specific information about the folding of SARS-2 M pro C is available, given their similarity, it is expected that SARS-2 M pro C will fold in a manner similar to SARS-1 M pro C. We test this by performing simulations of a Cα-SBM of SARS-2 M pro C (see Methods) based on a previous Cα-SBM of SARS-1 M pro C whose folding broadly agrees with SARS-1 M pro C folding experiments. , The native contact map of SARS-2 M pro C used in the Cα-SBM is shown in Figure C. The SARS-2 M pro C Cα-SBM simulations performed at the folding temperature, T normal f , were analyzed using the number of formed native contacts ( Q ) as a progress coordinate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The minimum for the harmonic term was set to the distance between the centers of mass of the two monomers in the folded dimer (WT CP2: 0.16 nm, CiP CP2: 0.22 nm). Previous simulations have used this technique to prevent unfolded monomers from drifting too far from each other. Although this is a weak harmonic constraint, the values of the force constant and the centers of mass distance do marginally affect the height of the free energy barrier with an increase in barrier height seen at lower force constants. However, the change in parameter values does not affect the folding mechanism (see the Supporting Information Figures S3–S5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%