Those of us who have been active in the field of molecular cell biology for two or more decades have seen profound changes in the structure and the modus operandi of our science. One of the consequences has been a decline in the importance of ideas. It used to be that ideas were critical to inform experiments over a long term, to suggest which experiments among innumerable possibilities should be undertaken, and to provide a conceptual framework with which to think about a problem. However, this was before the advent of the powerful technologies of molecular genetics and the use of recombinant DNA, polymerase chain reaction, and monoclonal antibodies. These procedures, tossed off so glibly here, involve a lot of hard work and are very time consuming. The information they produce can often be astonishing and unexpected and immeasurably more detailed than has heretofore been possible in this field. There is no desire on my part to denigrate these efforts; on the contrary,