2004
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-828890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Molecular Pathogenesis of Cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: Cholangiocarcinoma is rising in clinical importance because of increasing incidence, poor prognosis, and suboptimal response to therapy. Recent investigations into the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in cholangiocarcinogenesis and tumor growth have contributed greatly to our understanding of this disease. To review this topic, we discuss the molecular mechanisms in sections reflecting the unique features that allow cancer cells to develop and maintain a growth advantage. Through a better understanding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the G s -coupled EP 2 and EP 4 receptors mediate their effect via increasing intracellular cAMP levels and that activation of cAMP/protein kinase A signaling is known to enhance the proliferation and motility of cholangiocytes and cholangiocarcinoma cells, the lack of EP 2 and EP 4 receptor effect revealed in this study further underscores the importance of EP 1 receptormediated EGFR transactivation in cholangiocarcinoma progression. It is of further interest that the experiments with the EP 3 receptor agonist ONO-AE-248 and EP 3 receptor siRNA also failed to show involvement of the G i -coupled EP 3 receptor, despite that fact that G i is known to exert its effect through reduction of cAMP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that the G s -coupled EP 2 and EP 4 receptors mediate their effect via increasing intracellular cAMP levels and that activation of cAMP/protein kinase A signaling is known to enhance the proliferation and motility of cholangiocytes and cholangiocarcinoma cells, the lack of EP 2 and EP 4 receptor effect revealed in this study further underscores the importance of EP 1 receptormediated EGFR transactivation in cholangiocarcinoma progression. It is of further interest that the experiments with the EP 3 receptor agonist ONO-AE-248 and EP 3 receptor siRNA also failed to show involvement of the G i -coupled EP 3 receptor, despite that fact that G i is known to exert its effect through reduction of cAMP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most abundant prostaglandin in cholangiocarcinoma cells is PGE 2 (15). There are four EP receptor subtypes that can bind to PGE 2 : EP 1 , EP 2 , EP 3 , and EP 4 . The EP 1 receptor is coupled with the G q protein and thus signals through phospholipase C and intracellular Ca 2ϩ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In fact, many mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been identified in human CC tissues, suggest- ing that biliary neoplastic cells may arise from cellular and consequent DNA injury. 22 However, how somatic mutations accumulate through the process of human cholangiocarcinogenesis is unknown. In the current study, we demonstrated that a recently identified DNA editing enzyme, AID, is induced by proinflammatory cytokine stimulation in biliary epithelial cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is beyond the scope of this review to provide a detailed analysis of each of these factors and their relationship to the molecular pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. However, the reader is referred to the several recent reviews 7,[42][43][44][45][46][47] for an updated analysis of the molecular pathological features of cholangiocarcinoma. This section instead highlights such factors as tumor location, subtype, and grade, which have been found to be associated with variations in the frequencies of expression of selected molecular alterations and which need to be considered when assessing outcome and in devising molecular therapeutic strategies for cholangiocarcinoma.…”
Section: Molecular Alterations and Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%