2014
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1411.4088
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MOLLER Experiment: An Ultra-Precise Measurement of the Weak Mixing Angle Using Møller Scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, our observation of large (≈ +20 ppm) inclusive parity-violating pion asymmetries is relevant as a source of potential backgrounds for the MOLLER experiment [52].…”
Section: Longitudinal Pion Asymmetry a L πmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, our observation of large (≈ +20 ppm) inclusive parity-violating pion asymmetries is relevant as a source of potential backgrounds for the MOLLER experiment [52].…”
Section: Longitudinal Pion Asymmetry a L πmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We note that our observation of such a large (≈ −60 ppm) BNSSA for inclusive pions at multi-GeV beam energies is important for the design of future precision parity-violation experiments such as the planned 11 GeV MOLLER experiment at Jefferson Lab [52], as pions might produce significant azimuthally-varying background asymmetries.…”
Section: Pion Transverse Asymmetry a T πmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We note an existing experimental anomaly with respect to the SM for neutrino-nucleon scattering at the Q ∼ GeV c −1 scale (32). The current uncertainty from CEvNS measurements is at the ∼10% level at stopped-pion Q values of a few tens of MeV c −1 ; this is not currently competitive with other methods for determining θW at low Q from parity-violating electron-proton scattering (33), Moller scattering (34) and atomic parity violation (35). However, none of these experiments probe BSM physics that is specific to interactions of neutrinos and quarks, which would manifest as an inferred value of θW differing from the nominal SM expectation.…”
Section: Standard-model Weak Mixing Anglementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that values of |g 11 i | above the black band produce a |∆a e | that is too large and are thus excluded by the measurement; we refer to the text for further discussion. We also show the excluded region at 90% CL from the measurement of parity-violating Møller scattering from the E158 [82] experiment (solid boundary), as well as the excluded region anticipated from the expected sensitivity of the planned MOLLER experiment (dashed boundary) at Jefferson Laboratory [83,84], if no departure from the SM is observed. Constraints on the lightest M X i masses can come from the measured running of α(s); please see Sec.…”
Section: New Scalar Contributions To a Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parity-violating asymmetry A PV in the low-momentum-transfer scattering of longitudinally polarized electrons from unpolarized electrons has been measured to a precision of 17 ppb in the E158 experiment at SLAC, yielding a determination of the value of the effective weak mixing angle sin 2 θ eff W to 0.5% precision [82]. In contrast, in a future experiment planned at the Jefferson Laboratory [83,84], the MOLLER collaboration expects to measure A PV to an overall precision of 0.7 ppb [84], to determine sin 2 θ eff W to 0.1% precision [84], with a commensurate improvement of A PV as a test of new physics. The determination of the weak mixing angle relies on the theoretical assessment of A PV in the SM [85][86][87][88][89][90], for which electroweak radiative corrections are important [86][87][88][89][90].…”
Section: Constraints From Parity-violating Møller Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%