2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The monotonic dependency of prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex on the intensity of the startle-eliciting stimulus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bortolato et al 2007;Crawley et al 1997;McCaughran et al 1997;Paylor and Crawley 1997). This is of significant concern because differences in the baseline startle reactivity can seriously complicate or confound the interpretation of the results obtained on PPI (Csomor et al 2006(Csomor et al , 2008Hoffman and Searle 1965;Swerdlow et al 2000;Yee et al 2005). The dependency of PPI magnitude on baseline startle reactivity has been demonstrated in rodents and humans (Csomor et al 2006(Csomor et al , 2008Hince and MartinIverson 2005;Yee et al 2005)-a finding that has been incorporated also by computational models of PPI (Sandner and Canal 2007;Schmajuk and Larrauri 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bortolato et al 2007;Crawley et al 1997;McCaughran et al 1997;Paylor and Crawley 1997). This is of significant concern because differences in the baseline startle reactivity can seriously complicate or confound the interpretation of the results obtained on PPI (Csomor et al 2006(Csomor et al , 2008Hoffman and Searle 1965;Swerdlow et al 2000;Yee et al 2005). The dependency of PPI magnitude on baseline startle reactivity has been demonstrated in rodents and humans (Csomor et al 2006(Csomor et al , 2008Hince and MartinIverson 2005;Yee et al 2005)-a finding that has been incorporated also by computational models of PPI (Sandner and Canal 2007;Schmajuk and Larrauri 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The dependency of PPI magnitude on baseline startle reactivity has been demonstrated in rodents and humans (Csomor et al 2006(Csomor et al , 2008Hince and MartinIverson 2005;Yee et al 2005)-a finding that has been incorporated also by computational models of PPI (Sandner and Canal 2007;Schmajuk and Larrauri 2005). The present study was undertaken to initially address the confounding phenotype on startle reactivity in comparison with C57BL/6 mice using a more stringent parametric design of PPI assessment incorporating multiple pulse intensities (Csomor et al 2006(Csomor et al , 2008Yee et al 2005). With this PPI design, we went on to investigate if the DBA/2 substrain may enjoy superior sensitivity (compared with C57BL/6 mice) in the detection of atypical neuroleptic drugs using clozapine as the reference compound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the known differences between mice and rats in the modulation of PPI by different subtypes of dopamine receptors (e.g., Doherty et al 2008; Ralph-Williams et al 2003), it is of fundamental importance to ascertain whether the robust PPI-disruptive effect of scopolamine seen in rats is translatable to mice. Moreover, three of the five mice studies quoted in Table 1 reported a confounding increase in startle reactivity that could complicate interpretation of PPI data because there is ample evidence for a dependency of PPI on the baseline startle reactivity in mice as well as humans (Csomor et al 2006, 2008; Yee et al 2005). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of startle magnitude on prepulse+pulse condition compared with pulse-alone condition is divided by the latter and expressed in percent, i.e., %PPI = (prepulse+pulse startle – pulse-alone) × 100%. This proportion measure is sensitive to independent changes in startle reactivity obtained on pulse-alone condition in humans (Csomor et al 2006) as well as rodents (Yee et al 2005). Interpretation of this measure would not be straightforward in the presence of a notable treatment effect on baseline startle reaction.…”
Section: Behavioural Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%