2019
DOI: 10.1101/610287
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The more the merrier? Multivariate approaches to genome-wide association analysis

Abstract: The vast majority of genome-wide association (GWA) studies analyze a single trait while large-scale multivariate data sets are available. As complex traits are highly polygenic, and pleiotropy seems ubiquitous, it is essential to determine when multivariate association tests (MATs) outperform univariate approaches in terms of power. We discuss the statistical background of 19 MATs and give an overview of their statistical properties. We address the Type I error rates of these MATs and demonstrate which factors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent comparison of statistical power of 19 multivariate genomewide association methods, it was shown that S Het seems to benefit from the presence of opposite effect estimates, which is relevant for dietary composition. In addition, Shet performed slightly better when applied to highly correlated traits (Vroom et al, 2019).…”
Section: Single-trait and Multi-trait Genome-wide Association Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a recent comparison of statistical power of 19 multivariate genomewide association methods, it was shown that S Het seems to benefit from the presence of opposite effect estimates, which is relevant for dietary composition. In addition, Shet performed slightly better when applied to highly correlated traits (Vroom et al, 2019).…”
Section: Single-trait and Multi-trait Genome-wide Association Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ABCD Data Acquisition and Integration Core provided similar, but not identical, restingstate fMRI-derived phenotypes for replication purposes. Instead of the 17 Yeo & Krienen networks based on 1,000 parcels, temporal variance in 333 Gordon-defined parcels and 66 average correlations between 12 Gordon-defined networks were available 45 . We averaged the parcel variances belonging to the same network to achieve comparability to our discovery phenotypes.…”
Section: Functional Mri-derived Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate GWAS approaches gain their statistical power due to the distributed nature of genetic influences across phenotypes 12 . Such approaches are well-suited for the identification of pleiotropic variants and genes with effects across neuroimaging modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges include trans-ethnic bias across populations (i.e. GWAS sample size for non-European populations is relatively lower and a PRS derived from one population is expected to perform less well in other populations due to differences in allele frequencies, linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns and effect sizes across different populations) [ 20 , 21 , 22 ] and architectural diversity across multiple correlated traits [ 23 ]. Some other challenges include the lack of clear guidelines on clinical interpretation of PGx polygenic models, PGx studies usually requiring more well-defined drug response clinical endpoints, and the lack of PRS reporting guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%