2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The more the poorer? Resource sharing and scale economies in large families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Child shares increase with the number of Children, but at a decreasing rate, a pattern is also found in these studies. There are several explanations among which are the classic quality–quantity trade‐off and the possibility of scale economies along siblings (as explored in recent contributions by Calvi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Child shares increase with the number of Children, but at a decreasing rate, a pattern is also found in these studies. There are several explanations among which are the classic quality–quantity trade‐off and the possibility of scale economies along siblings (as explored in recent contributions by Calvi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case and Deaton (1998) suggest that the transfers are used much the same as other income, whileDuflo (2003) finds that gender of the transfer recipient is essential for success. Note that other studies consider gendered income shocks rather than policies, but are related to the present context since they also reject income pooling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study from long-run historical data in the US found that scale economies by expenditure groups changed in unanticipated ways over time ( Logan, 2011 ), suggesting potential for a high degree of context-specificity. Another recent study found scale economies in Mexico but not Bangladesh ( Calvi et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 1.1 shows that several 'collective model' studies of intra-household resource allocation find no evidence that women are disadvantaged in intra-household resource allocation. Lechene et al (2019) only find statistically significant differences in resource allocation in two out of five countries studied; Bargain et al (2014) find no statistically significant differences; and Calvi et al (2023) find differences in only one country. Others do find evidence of gender inequality disadvantaging women.…”
Section: Measuring the Intra-household Distribution Of Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 93%