2015
DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000000289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Morphological Difference Between Glaucoma and Other Optic Neuropathies

Abstract: The clinical phenomenon of cupping has two principal pathophysiologic components in all optic neuropathies: prelaminar thinning and laminar deformation. We define prelaminar thinning to be the portion of cup enlargement that results from thinning of the prelaminar tissues due to physical compression and/or loss of Retinal Ganglion Cell axons. We define laminar deformation or laminar cupping to be the portion of cup enlargement that results from permanent, intraocular pressure-(IOP) induced deformation of the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
59
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Shallow forms of cupping can be due to neuroretinal rim loss alone, and can confound the clinical interpretation of all forms of optic neuropathy. 19,20 While the mechanistic, predictive and treatment implications of their detection are not yet certain, we propose that in any optic neuropathy, the presence or progression of the connective tissue phenomena we describe suggest that an IOP-related mechanism may be present whether or not an IOPrelated insult is the primary cause of the neuropathy and without regard for the level of IOP at which the primary insult or progression has occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…20 Shallow forms of cupping can be due to neuroretinal rim loss alone, and can confound the clinical interpretation of all forms of optic neuropathy. 19,20 While the mechanistic, predictive and treatment implications of their detection are not yet certain, we propose that in any optic neuropathy, the presence or progression of the connective tissue phenomena we describe suggest that an IOP-related mechanism may be present whether or not an IOPrelated insult is the primary cause of the neuropathy and without regard for the level of IOP at which the primary insult or progression has occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Shallow forms of cupping can be due to neuroretinal rim loss alone, and can confound the clinical interpretation of all forms of optic neuropathy. 19,20 While the mechanistic, predictive and treatment implications of their detection are not yet certain, we propose that in any optic neuropathy, the presence or progression of the connective tissue phenomena we describe suggest that an IOP-related mechanism may be present whether or not an IOPrelated insult is the primary cause of the neuropathy and without regard for the level of IOP at which the primary insult or progression has occurred. In these regards, while our own longitudinal study detected progressive laminar deformation using SDOCT early in monkey EG, 25 two subsequent studies have failed to demonstrate SDOCT-detected laminar deformation in the monkey experimental optic neuropathies of surgical CSF lowering 37 and surgical optic nerve transection (Ing E, et al IOVS 2015;56:ARVO E-Abstract 999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] The LC stabilizes intraocular pressure (IOP) by forming a barrier between the intraocular space and the extraocular space, and it has been considered the principal site of retinal ganglion cell mechanical axonal injury in glaucomatous damage. 17 Burgoyne 18 has proposed that only ''laminar'' or ''deep'' forms of ONH cupping are pathognomonic for glaucoma and that laminar deformation in nonglaucomatous optic neuropathy, such as that induced by experimentally reduced cerebrospinal fluid pressure in monkeys, might be minimal. [19][20][21] However, histologic studies may be prone to the effects of tissue swelling or shrinkage from fixation processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%