2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The morphological identification of micro-residues on stone tools using light microscopy: progress and difficulties based on blind tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Wear traces on soft shales and siltstones and even harder sandstone-based specimens may vanish completely, leaving only a smooth undulating surface with slight indications of wear traces that were formerly prominent. In order to clarify the use of ground ochres as crayons, it is essential to perform residue analyses on archaeological specimens (e.g., Loy and Hardy, 1992;Lombard, 2005;Lombard and Wadley, 2007).…”
Section: Archaeological Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wear traces on soft shales and siltstones and even harder sandstone-based specimens may vanish completely, leaving only a smooth undulating surface with slight indications of wear traces that were formerly prominent. In order to clarify the use of ground ochres as crayons, it is essential to perform residue analyses on archaeological specimens (e.g., Loy and Hardy, 1992;Lombard, 2005;Lombard and Wadley, 2007).…”
Section: Archaeological Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of this methodological approach has resulted in the production of firm evidence for a variety of aspects of the MSA that in the past would have been beyond our reach. These include hunting and tool production procedures (Lombard 2004(Lombard , 2005(Lombard , 2006a(Lombard , b, c, 2007Lombard et al 2004;Lombard and Wadley 2007;Soriano et al 2009;Wadley 2005;, site use and management (Wadley 2006b;Wadley and Jacobs 2004;Wadley and Whitelaw 2006), and style (Wurz 1999(Wurz , 2000(Wurz , 2005. However, it is also possible to use the chaîne opératoire to provide evidence of a more fundamental nature.…”
Section: Methodology-the Chaîne Opératoirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical plant residues are cellulose (amorphous, tissues and fibres), sap, resin, starch grains, raphides and druses, each with specific characteristics that generally allow their microscopic identification (for identification characteristics see Franceschi and Horner 1980:381;Fullagar 1986:176;Gunning and Steer 1975:117;Horner and Wagner 1995:56;Langenheim 2003:46;Robertson 2005:54-85). Among the animal residues identified on stone artefacts are blood (including proteinaceous films and red blood cells), bone, animal tissue and fibres (including collagen and muscle), lipids, feathers and hair Cooper 2003;David 1993;Francis 2000Francis , 2002Fullagar 1986;Fullagar and Jones 2004;Lombard and Wadley 2005;Loy , 1985Robertson , 2006Tomlinson 2001;Wadley et al 2004a;Williamson 2000). Microscopic identification to a specific taxonomic level is only possible with a limited number of these residue types, namely, hair and feather, and then only if the residue is relatively undamaged and there is access to a reference collection of local specimens (Loy 1985Loy and Nelson 1986;.…”
Section: Residue Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%