2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-018-0481-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Morphologies and Kinematics of Supernova Remnants

Abstract: We review the major advances in understanding the morphologies and kinematics of supernova remnants (SNRs). Simulations of SN explosions have improved dramatically over the last few years, and SNRs can be used to test models through comparison of predictions with SNRs' observed large-scale compositional and morphological properties as well as the three-dimensional kinematics of ejecta material. In particular, Cassiopeia A -the youngest known core-collapse SNR in the Milky Way -offers an up-close view of the co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that we have only considered constant accretion rates here, whereas scenarios with changing accretion rates are more realistic for CCOs, as their environment is highly variable (see, e.g., Vink 2012;Lopez & Fesen 2018). For example, it is possible that the NS initially accretes at very low rates after the nearby environment has been cleared out by the SN shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that we have only considered constant accretion rates here, whereas scenarios with changing accretion rates are more realistic for CCOs, as their environment is highly variable (see, e.g., Vink 2012;Lopez & Fesen 2018). For example, it is possible that the NS initially accretes at very low rates after the nearby environment has been cleared out by the SN shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when considering central compact objects (CCOs), the NS is within a supernova remnant, for which the distribution and composition differ from the ISM (see, e.g. Vink 2012; Lopez & Fesen 2018). Following classical accretion physics (see, e.g.…”
Section: Ism Accretion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make major progress, we need observations that reveal the 3D structure of SNRs, as was done for Cas A (DeLaney et al 2010;Milisavljevic & Fesen 2015). See Lopez & Fesen (2018) for the exciting prospects in the X-ray domain. This will realize the full potential of 3D simulations, from the SN to the SNR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Energetic particles radiate at both ends of the spectrum: electrons produce synchrotron radiation in a magnetic field, from radio to gamma energies, and inverse Compton radiation on the ambient photon fields, in -rays; protons induce pion decay from collisions with ambient matter, which also produces -ray photons. See Reynolds (2008) and Vink (2012) for reviews of observations from the high-energy perspective, and Lopez & Fesen (2018) for a review focused on morphology and kinematics. 2 1 The shocked ejecta can also be detected in the optical: see the discovery by Seitenzahl et al (2019).…”
Section: Introduction To Supernova Remnantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SNR, spatially resolved high resolution spectroscopy provided by Athena X‐IFU will enable the derivation of 3D maps for the different synthesized elements in the ejected material. The morphology of SNRs is indeed a clue to SN type, explosion mechanism, and progenitor (e.g., see, the review by Lopez & Fesen . More precisely, the morphology and asymmetries in the ejection of the supernova material are intimately related to the properties of the explosion mechanism, whose understanding is still incomplete.…”
Section: Breakthroughs Expected From Athena On the Astrophysics Of Exmentioning
confidence: 99%