1999
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.1999.10011182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The morphology and systematics ofAvaceratops, a primitive horned dinosaur from the Judith River Formation (Late Campanian) of Montana, with the description of a second skull

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ventrally displaced maxillary toothrow, elongate supraorbital horncores, pronounced epijugals) otherwise absent in all other late Campanian centrosaurines. Phylogenetic analysis (figure 2; see also the electronic supplementary material for character definitions, matrix and expanded summary of results) places Nasutoceratops as the sister taxon of Avaceratops from the Judith River Formation of Montana [21,28]. Together, Nasutoceratops and Avaceratops form a previously unrecognized clade that branched off near the base of Centrosaurinae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ventrally displaced maxillary toothrow, elongate supraorbital horncores, pronounced epijugals) otherwise absent in all other late Campanian centrosaurines. Phylogenetic analysis (figure 2; see also the electronic supplementary material for character definitions, matrix and expanded summary of results) places Nasutoceratops as the sister taxon of Avaceratops from the Judith River Formation of Montana [21,28]. Together, Nasutoceratops and Avaceratops form a previously unrecognized clade that branched off near the base of Centrosaurinae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while ANSP 15800 and a referred "adult Avaceratops" MOR 692 (Penkalski and Dodson 1999) do both occur in the Judith River Formation, it will never be possible to definitively assign the latter specimen to Avaceratops without a series of ontogenetic intermediates linking ANSP 15800 to a diagnostic adult morphology of MOR 692. We also note two of the arguments (lack of epimarginals and fenestrated parietals) for assigning MOR 692 as an adult Avaceratops by Penkalski and Dodson (1999) are weakened by the fact that (i) MOR 692 does have epiparietals, although they are low and well fused to the underlying parietal; and (ii) the parietals are incomplete in both specimens, and although small, anteriorly placed fenestrae could have been present, there is no evidence that they were. Finally, we note that the specimens are not chronostratigraphically equivalent, being separated by at least 2 Ma (Fig.…”
Section: Comments On Avaceratopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Malta new taxon thins adjacent to the thickened rami. It has been argued (Penkalski and Dodson 1999) that ANSP 15800 and MOR 692 lack parietal fenestrae, but this condition is difficult to determine in either specimen due to breakage; however, if they were present in either, they would have been small. Similarly, our reconstruction of the frill of CMN 8804 (Fig.…”
Section: Relationships Of Cmn 8804mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This morphology is common to all known ceratopsids (e.g., Brown, 1917;Lehman 1989;Holmes and Ryan, 2013). However, morphology of the ribs associated with the last dorsal and dorsosacral vertebrae Centrosaurus (Brown 1917) 0.81 Centrosaurus (Lull 1933) 0.70 Styracosaurus (Holmes and Ryan 2013) 0.74 Brachyceratops (Gilmore 1917) 0.80 Avaceratops (Penkalski and Dodson 1999) 0.80* Triceratops (Gilmore 1917) 0.63 Triceratops (Penkalski and Dodson 1999) 0.59 Triceratops (Fujiwara 2009) 0.66 Vagaceratops 0.68 cf. Anchiceratops (Mallon and Holmes 2010) 0.73 Chasmosaurus belli (CMN 2245, Sternberg 1927 0.71 Chasmosaurus belli (ROM 843, J. Mallon, pers.…”
Section: Rib Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%