2003
DOI: 10.1137/s1064827501386006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mortar Edge Element Method in Three Dimensions: Application to Magnetostatics

Abstract: The subject presented in this paper concerns the approximation of a magnetostatic problem, where the primary unknown is the magnetic vector potential in a three-dimensional system composed of two solid parts separated by an interface. The approximation of the problem here is based on the mortar element method combined with edge elements on tetrahedral meshes that do not match at the interface. In this paper we describe the proposed method and its implementation aspects together with some numerical results that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As now a standard procedure for nonconforming domain decomposition methods, the mortar element method leads to impose the transmission condition in a weak form by means of a suitable space of Lagrange multipliers . Once discretized, both domains by two independently created meshes of tetrahedra ( is the maximum size of all mesh tetrahedra), we introduce two edge element spaces as in [4] and the space of tangential components on of functions in . We choose as a proper subset of , such that as in [4].…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As now a standard procedure for nonconforming domain decomposition methods, the mortar element method leads to impose the transmission condition in a weak form by means of a suitable space of Lagrange multipliers . Once discretized, both domains by two independently created meshes of tetrahedra ( is the maximum size of all mesh tetrahedra), we introduce two edge element spaces as in [4] and the space of tangential components on of functions in . We choose as a proper subset of , such that as in [4].…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once discretized, both domains by two independently created meshes of tetrahedra ( is the maximum size of all mesh tetrahedra), we introduce two edge element spaces as in [4] and the space of tangential components on of functions in . We choose as a proper subset of , such that as in [4]. The definition of involving the edge element space gives a different but similar mortar method (in the mortar terminology, this means that we choose as the master and as the slave).…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here again, if one wants to avoid a local remeshing near the transition interface, possibly having to use rather distorted elements, the problem of non matching grids pops out again. There are obviously other applications where you cannot avoid non matching grids: for instance when studying sliding pieces [14], or contact problems [25], or several other types of problems (see e.g. [3], [34], [32], [39], [33] and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%