2015
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE MOSDEF SURVEY: ELECTRON DENSITY AND IONIZATION PARAMETER AT z ∼ 2.3*

Abstract: Using observations from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey, we investigate the physical conditions of star-forming regions in z ∼ 2.3 galaxies, specifically the electron density and ionization state. From measurements of the [O ii]λλ3726,3729 and [S ii]λλ6716,6731 doublets, we find a median electron density of ∼ 250 cm −3 at z ∼ 2.3, an increase of an order of magnitude compared to measurements of galaxies at z ∼ 0. While z ∼ 2.3 galaxies are offset towards significantly higher O 32 values relati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

88
563
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(660 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(225 reference statements)
88
563
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This ne value at z = 2-3 is about an order of magnitude higher than the typical value of local galaxies, ne ∼ 25 cm −3 , which is derived by Sanders et al (2016) from the sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al 2000). Although there is a large difference of the ne values between z = 2-3 and local SFGs, photoionization models indicate that this ne difference can increase [O III] λ5007/Hβ and [N II] λ6584/Hα values only by ∼ 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 dex for SFGs with the oxygen abundances of 12+log(O/H) =8.0, 8.3, and 8.5, respectively (Sanders et al 2016). These small changes cannot explain the BPT offset, suggesting that the ne evolution is not the major source of the BPT offset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This ne value at z = 2-3 is about an order of magnitude higher than the typical value of local galaxies, ne ∼ 25 cm −3 , which is derived by Sanders et al (2016) from the sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al 2000). Although there is a large difference of the ne values between z = 2-3 and local SFGs, photoionization models indicate that this ne difference can increase [O III] λ5007/Hβ and [N II] λ6584/Hα values only by ∼ 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 dex for SFGs with the oxygen abundances of 12+log(O/H) =8.0, 8.3, and 8.5, respectively (Sanders et al 2016). These small changes cannot explain the BPT offset, suggesting that the ne evolution is not the major source of the BPT offset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our calculations are terminated when the hydrogen ionization fractions reach ≤ 1%. (Shimakawa et al 2015;Sanders et al 2016). Thus, the dependence of ne is negligible in our Te estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After iterating over the parent sample several times, the selection converges, yielding a reference sample of 475 objects that we refer to as the "reference H ii region sample." Objects in this sample have detections of [O ii] Electron temperatures are calculated using a fivelevel atom approximation and up-to-date atomic data (Sanders et al 2016). For the transition probabilities, we use values from the NIST MCHF database (Fischer & Tachiev 2014) for all ions.…”
Section: Abundances and Line Emission Of H II Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correcting strongline MZRs for biases can thus provide more robust determinations of the evolution of the MZR. However, potential evolution of physical conditions of star-forming regions with redshift may ultimately require a reevaluation of strong-line calibrations at high redshift (Steidel et al 2014;Sanders et al 2015;Shapley et al 2015). Even so, eliminating observational biases from z ∼ 0 strongline MZR measurements provides a more robust baseline relative to which metallicity evolution can be inferred.…”
Section: Application To the Z ∼ 0 Mzr And Fmrmentioning
confidence: 99%