1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02407644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mössbauer isomer shift calibration problem — Revisited for the Mössbauer isotopes Sn to I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calibration constants˛and fractional charge radii R/R for several Mössbauer nuclei are collected in Table 3 [107][108][109][110][111][112]. In determination of these parameters, the results of quantum chemical calculations of the contact densities (0) or partial contact densities n k (0) have been used in the interpretation of Mössbauer and internal conversion experiments.…”
Section: Isomer Shift Of 119 Sn and Other Mössbauer Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration constants˛and fractional charge radii R/R for several Mössbauer nuclei are collected in Table 3 [107][108][109][110][111][112]. In determination of these parameters, the results of quantum chemical calculations of the contact densities (0) or partial contact densities n k (0) have been used in the interpretation of Mössbauer and internal conversion experiments.…”
Section: Isomer Shift Of 119 Sn and Other Mössbauer Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most measurements cluster between 4 × 10 −4 and 5× 10 −4 [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. We use the most up-to-date (to our knowledge) value, R/R = 4.3 × 10 −4 , reported by Hartmann and Winkler [39] and characterised by them as the best experimental data available. For 127 I, we use R/R = −3.4 × 10 −4 , taken from the same work [39].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Yakobi et al revised above value to Q g (127) = −0.680(10) b. Alonso et al derived | Q g (127) | = 0.722 b from the full potential linearized augmented plane-wave method and nuclear quadrupole resonance data. Hartmann and Winkler estimated calibration constants as α 127 = −0.083 mm s −1 au 3 and α 129 = +0.221 mm s −1 au 3 . Erickson et al attempted to calculate iodine electron density in the solid environment by using density functional method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%