2014
DOI: 10.1108/s1571-502720140000027027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“The Most Public Secret”: Concealing and Silencing Ethnocentrism in the MNC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the centrality of the home country culture and language also influences HQ actors’ firm-specific cultural capital endowment (Levy et al, 2015). In hierarchical architecture, elements of corporate culture and national culture are intertwined and mixed with each other (Storgaard et al, 2014), and consequently firm-specific cultural capital involves elements of the home country. Therefore, HQ actors’ adeptness in the MNC’s home country culture, values and language is an important source of firm-specific cultural capital.…”
Section: Cultural Capital and The Production Of Social Hierarchy Undementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the centrality of the home country culture and language also influences HQ actors’ firm-specific cultural capital endowment (Levy et al, 2015). In hierarchical architecture, elements of corporate culture and national culture are intertwined and mixed with each other (Storgaard et al, 2014), and consequently firm-specific cultural capital involves elements of the home country. Therefore, HQ actors’ adeptness in the MNC’s home country culture, values and language is an important source of firm-specific cultural capital.…”
Section: Cultural Capital and The Production Of Social Hierarchy Undementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the definition of the legitimate firm-specific cultural capital is likely to become more inclusive, thereby diminishing the impact of the HQ and the home country. Even though the home country culture may continue to exert influence over firm-specific cultural capital, its influence is now considered as less legitimate and therefore often concealed and framed in more neutral terms as ‘corporate culture’ and ‘discipline’ (Storgaard et al, 2014). As a result of the decentralization of authority, HQ actors may see their power and influence eroding and therefore attempt to contest the transition and minimize its adverse effect on their social position.…”
Section: Cultural Capital and The Production Of Social Hierarchy Undementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Michailova et al (2017) criticize the notion advanced in much of the MNC literature for its simplistic treatment of power relations. In many cases, ethnocentrism can be intentional (Mayrhofer & Brewster, 1996) and it can take the guise of the ‘global’ (Storgaard et al, 2014). In this sense, the mainstream international business literature has hardly addressed the ‘global’ windowdressing or dealt with the rising trends of parochialism, nationalism, ethnocentrism and neocolonialism in MNCs and their operating environments (Ailon & Kunda, 2009; Koveshnikov et al, 2016).…”
Section: From Ethnocentrism To Neocolonialism In Mnc Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are witnessing a trend of anti-globalization and protectionism (Alvarez & Rangan, 2019), which is reflected in ‘a rediscovery of the local’ in many walks of life (Ginty, 2015, p. 845). The revival of nationalist sentiment in North America, Europe, Asia and beyond has encouraged many multinational corporations (MNCs) to emphasize their local roots, identifying openly with their countries of origin (Dahles & Stobbe, 2004; Storgaard, Tienari, & Piekkari, 2014). The ‘global mindset’ that was once seen as the pinnacle of MNC evolution (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2002; Perlmutter, 1969) is challenged by ethnocentric attitudes and practices in the subsidiaries (Ailon & Kunda, 2009; Koveshnikov, Vaara, & Ehrnrooth, 2016) as well as in the corporate headquarters (HQ) (Michailova, Piekkari, Storgaard, & Tienari, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%