2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2018.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The most stable adsorption geometries of two chiral modifiers on Pt(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broad feature at 1320–1230 cm –1 is composed of three peaks: an ester group vibration at ∼1297 cm –1 and two lower-frequency bands due to ρ­(O–CH 3 ) and ν sym (CF 3 ) vibrations. Chemisorption of the chiral modifier is detected by a δ sym (CH 3 ) band at 1377 cm –1 (Figure b) . As reported elsewhere, the selective RAIRS activity of this peak in the midfrequency region is fully consistent with the predicted ( R )-NEA adsorption geometry (insert to Figure b) where the naphthyl group is π-bonded to the surface and the amine group forms an additional on-top bond to a platinum atom …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The broad feature at 1320–1230 cm –1 is composed of three peaks: an ester group vibration at ∼1297 cm –1 and two lower-frequency bands due to ρ­(O–CH 3 ) and ν sym (CF 3 ) vibrations. Chemisorption of the chiral modifier is detected by a δ sym (CH 3 ) band at 1377 cm –1 (Figure b) . As reported elsewhere, the selective RAIRS activity of this peak in the midfrequency region is fully consistent with the predicted ( R )-NEA adsorption geometry (insert to Figure b) where the naphthyl group is π-bonded to the surface and the amine group forms an additional on-top bond to a platinum atom …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Simpler models have been used to better be able to address the fundamental chemistry involved, following a so-called modern surface science approach. Well-defined surfaces, single crystal or polycrystalline disks of the main metal in this case, are placed in well-controlled environments, namely, ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions, to be able to use a battery of surface-sensitive techniques such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), ,,, temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), ,,, and reflection–absorption infrared absorption spectroscopy (RAIRS), ,, to extract molecular details on the adsorption and reactivity of the reactants and modifiers. ,, This approach has provided much insight into the surface chiral chemistry involved, but is limited by the simplicity of the systems used, which do not include the solvent present under catalytic conditions (a fact referred to as the “pressure gap”), and ignores the characteristics of realistic catalysts, where the metal is present as small nanoparticles (NPs) dispersed on a high-surface-area support, typically an oxide such as silica or alumina (the “materials gap”). , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, it can be seen from the comparison of structures g and i that the amine–Pt interaction has a similar on-top geometry for both ( R )-8Me-NEA-1 and ( R )-NEA-1. The possibility that ( R )-8Me-NEA undergoes partial dehydrogenation on Pt(111) is considered because Papp and co-workers reported that the conversion of toluene (Ph–CH 3 ) to benzyl (Ph–CH 2 ) on Pt(111) occurs upon heating above 270 K. However, as described elsewhere, detailed reflectance absorbance infrared spectroscopy measurements provide no clear evidence for dehydrogenation to ( R )-8CH 2 -NEA on Pt(111) . The thermal stability of the modifier may differ from that of toluene because of adsorption site constraints imposed by combined naphthyl–Pt and amine–Pt bonding.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in keeping with the strong chemisorption interaction, combining πchemisorption of the naphthyl ring and an additional N−Pt bond (Figure 1g−j). 29,37 Hence, for both chiral modifiers, the relative populations of the two conformers are determined by adsorption dynamics: once a naphthyl face finds its optimal interaction with the surface it cannot then convert under vacuum to a state with the opposite naphthyl face toward the surface. We attribute the lower calculated adsorption energy of (R)-8Me-NEA-2 relative to (R)-8Me-NEA-1 to intramolecular steric repulsion that forces the N−Pt bonding interaction out of its optimal on-top geometry.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%