2021
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16603.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mother during pregnancy and the puerperium: Detailed data abstracted from the clinical obstetric records of ALSPAC pregnancies

Abstract: Background: When the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) was planned, it was assumed that the clinical obstetric data would be easily accessible from the newly developed National Health Service computerised ‘STORK’ system. Pilot studies, however, showed that, although fairly accurate in regard to aspects of labour and delivery, it was, at the time (1990-2), inadequate for identifying the full antenatal and postnatal details of clinical complications and treatments of the women in the Study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we have described here the information covering the health of the fetus that has been abstracted from obstetric records and the treatment and health of the neonate that has been abstracted from paediatric records. The data described in this Data Note differ from that in a published Data Note which describes the mother during pregnancy and the puerperium ( Birmingham et al ., 2021a ; subsequently referred to as the Obstetric Data Note). In the currrent Data Note we describe the individual data relating to the fetuses/births rather than pregnancies, thus allowing for different answers for different members of a multiple pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, we have described here the information covering the health of the fetus that has been abstracted from obstetric records and the treatment and health of the neonate that has been abstracted from paediatric records. The data described in this Data Note differ from that in a published Data Note which describes the mother during pregnancy and the puerperium ( Birmingham et al ., 2021a ; subsequently referred to as the Obstetric Data Note). In the currrent Data Note we describe the individual data relating to the fetuses/births rather than pregnancies, thus allowing for different answers for different members of a multiple pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Index pregnancy mode of delivery was abstracted from routine antenatal records by trained research midwives and nurses, where it was recorded as spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), caesarean section, assisted breech, breech extraction, forceps, vacuum extraction, or other. 15 Women with ‘other’ mode of delivery ( n = 157) or conflicting modes of delivery ( n = 4) were excluded (Figure 1 ), to limit exposure misclassification. For the primary exposure, we dichotomised mode of delivery into vaginal delivery (SVD, breech extraction and assisted, forceps and vacuum) ( n = 9230) and caesarean section ( n = 1094).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter exclude admissions after the onset of labour. It should be noted that these details are also recorded in the dataset of information extracted from the medical records ( Birmingham et al , 2021 ).…”
Section: Procedures Reportedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, details of the reasons for the use of medications and the frequency with which she took analgesics such as paracetamol (acetaminophen) and aspirin. Elsewhere the actual medications the mother reported taking during pregnancy are detailed [ Headley et al , 2004 ], as are details of other sources of information such as the data abstracted from the medical records [ Birmingham et al , 2021 ] and the midwife recorded data on the STORK database [ Mummé et al , 2020 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%