1928
DOI: 10.1002/cne.900440304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The motor nuclei of the cranial nerves of Mus norvegicus albinus at birth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1928
1928
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 illustrates the location of WGA-HRP delivery sites and the corresponding locations of retrogradely labeled cells. Since FMNC cytoarchitectonic subdivisions are similar in neonatal and adult rats, the terminology of Hogg (1928) and Martin and Lodge (1977) is used. In all cases, labeled neurons within a given subnucleus were present throughout its rostrocaudal extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates the location of WGA-HRP delivery sites and the corresponding locations of retrogradely labeled cells. Since FMNC cytoarchitectonic subdivisions are similar in neonatal and adult rats, the terminology of Hogg (1928) and Martin and Lodge (1977) is used. In all cases, labeled neurons within a given subnucleus were present throughout its rostrocaudal extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efferent axons in the superior laryngeal nerve arise from the ventral formation of the nucleus ambiguus, a small group of cells ventrolateral to and rostral to the dorsal formation. The only other study of the nucleus ambiguus in the rat is that of Hogg (1928). He used Nissl and pyridine silver stains to describe the nucleus ambiguus in both newborn and adult rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual facial nerve branches, however, may innervate a number of different muscles and a particular muscle may be supplied by more than one nerve branch (Provis, 1977). Thus, early studies that found a close correspondence between subnuclei of the VII and the innervation territories of peripheral branches of the facial nerve may have been influenced by methodological artifact (van Gehuchten, 1898; Marinesco, 1899; Yagita, 1910; Papez, 1927; Hogg, 1928; Nishi, 1965; Courville, 1966a), not the true anatomical organization of the nucleus.…”
Section: Similarities Across Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%