2012
DOI: 10.1093/database/bar066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mouse-human anatomy ontology mapping project

Abstract: The overall objective of the Mouse–Human Anatomy Project (MHAP) was to facilitate the mapping and harmonization of anatomical terms used for mouse and human models by Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The anatomy resources designated for this study were the Adult Mouse Anatomy (MA) ontology and the set of anatomy concepts contained in the NCI Thesaurus (NCIt). Several methods and software tools were identified and evaluated, then used to conduct an in-depth comparative ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monarch uses four species-neutral ontologies that unify their species-specific counterparts (as shown in Figure 3): GENO for genotypes (19), UPheno for phenotypes (25), UBERON for anatomy (23), and MonDO for diseases (26). Prior efforts to map or integrate species-specific anatomical ontologies (24,48), for example, have been utilized in the construction of these species-neutral ontologies. The end result is a translational platform that allows a unified view of human, model and non-model organism biology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monarch uses four species-neutral ontologies that unify their species-specific counterparts (as shown in Figure 3): GENO for genotypes (19), UPheno for phenotypes (25), UBERON for anatomy (23), and MonDO for diseases (26). Prior efforts to map or integrate species-specific anatomical ontologies (24,48), for example, have been utilized in the construction of these species-neutral ontologies. The end result is a translational platform that allows a unified view of human, model and non-model organism biology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods are similar to the ones investigated in previous experiments performed with the CellFinder corpus (46). To enable data integration into the CellFinder database, all extracted mentions must be normalized to any of the ontologies or terminologies currently supported by our database: Cell Ontology (CL) (47), Cell Line Ontology (CLO) (48), EHDAA2 (49), Experimental Factor Ontology (EFO) (50), Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) (51), GO (52), Adult Mouse Anatomy (MA) (53) and Uberon (54). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies for adult mouse anatomy [Hayamizu et al, 2005]; developmental mouse anatomy [Armit et al, 2012; Baldock et al, 1999], and mammalian phenotype [Smith and Eppig, 2012] parallel the human ontologies. A number of efforts have developed cross-species ontological links for both anatomic [Travillian et al, 2011b; Dahdul et al, 2012; Mungall et al, 2012; Hayamizu et al, 2012; Niknejad et al, 2012] and phenotypic [Kohler et al, 2013] descriptors.…”
Section: Why a Dedicated Ontology For The Craniofacial Community?mentioning
confidence: 99%