2014
DOI: 10.20398/jscr.v5i1.5560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mouth Breathing Syndrome: prevalence, causes, consequences and treatments. A Literature Review

Abstract: The Mouth Breathing Syndrome (MBS) is characterized by pattern of mouth breathing (MB) or mixed breathing chronic caused by nasal obstruction or inflammatory factors, which may be present in half of the school children. The permanence of the framework affects the individual globally, and especially their stomatognathic functions, posture and quality of life, requiring multidisciplinary care. This paper aims to provide an overview of recent scientific production on the prevalence, etiologies, sequelae and treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the airflow was recorded using nasal pressure and mouth breathing was not controlled, which could reduce the accuracy of the developed models. Although the probability of mouth breathing is less than 12%–15% during sleep (Martins et al., 2014), further analyses are required to compare the accuracy of acoustic airflow estimation compared with airflow recorded with a full facemask connected to a pneumotachometer. Another limitation is that our study protocol did not include the gold‐standard assessment of respiratory effort that requires the invasive measurement of oesophageal pressure and is not usually performed in clinical sleep studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the airflow was recorded using nasal pressure and mouth breathing was not controlled, which could reduce the accuracy of the developed models. Although the probability of mouth breathing is less than 12%–15% during sleep (Martins et al., 2014), further analyses are required to compare the accuracy of acoustic airflow estimation compared with airflow recorded with a full facemask connected to a pneumotachometer. Another limitation is that our study protocol did not include the gold‐standard assessment of respiratory effort that requires the invasive measurement of oesophageal pressure and is not usually performed in clinical sleep studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pacheco et al, 32 menyebutkan bahwa 86,3% anak yang bernapas melalui mulut tidur dengan mulut terbuka dan 68,1% anak tidur mendengkur. OSA adalah sebuah gangguan tidur akibat obstruksi saluran pernapasan yang meningkat pada anak dengan kebiasaan bernapas melalui mulut, terbukti pada penelitian Martines, et al 33 bahwa 42% anak dengan kebiasaan bernapas melalui mulut mengalami OSA. OSA merupakan faktor risiko sleep bruxism (SB), yaitu kelainan sistem pengunyahan dengan mengertakan gigi saat tidur.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified