2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-013-7018-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Movement Disorders Society criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease dementia: their usefulness and limitations in elderly patients

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) in the elderly, and also to evaluate the relevance of applying other tests in this patient population. The MDS criteria include a first short part in checklist form, and a second part which is used as a basis for reference and consists of an in-depth neuropsychological examination. Forty consecutive PD patients presenting with cognitive complaints were enr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study expands the results for validation efforts of the MDS Task Force diagnostic procedures for Level I and Level II criteria for PDD. Our study findings add to the efforts of other centers to validate these potentially useful criteria Given that the conventional approach to defining dementia in PD incorporates traditional neuropsychological testing, with its associated variability in test selection and often time‐consuming assessments, the MDS Task Force efforts have focused on ways to standardize testing that can be used across multiple centers and to identify time‐efficient methods to diagnose PDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This study expands the results for validation efforts of the MDS Task Force diagnostic procedures for Level I and Level II criteria for PDD. Our study findings add to the efforts of other centers to validate these potentially useful criteria Given that the conventional approach to defining dementia in PD incorporates traditional neuropsychological testing, with its associated variability in test selection and often time‐consuming assessments, the MDS Task Force efforts have focused on ways to standardize testing that can be used across multiple centers and to identify time‐efficient methods to diagnose PDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This incidence was comparable to that found in some studies 35,36 but was inconsistent with that reported in some other studies. 32,[37][38][39] To our expectations, all the examined dementia scales (MMSE, MoCA, BD, RVR, DS, and FOME) demonstrated significant differences between patients with PDD and PDND. In ROC curve analysis, MMSE, MoCA, and BD showed better specificity and sensitivity when used alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As a cross-sectional study, the limitations of this study include its sampling population, which consists of moderate to advanced PwP, restricting the applicability of the aforementioned findings to people with early stage or mild disease and precludes inferences about causality. Secondly, due to the retrospective nature of the study, the group with cognition disability was defined using the more generic cognition domain score on the FUNDES-Adult instead of tests such as the Mini Mental State exam or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and definitions of the Movement Disorder Society criteria for PDD (39); cognition while those in this group may not strictly fulfill the diagnosis of "dementia" and may even include those with non-demented cognitive impairment, this method may have wider applicability in the primary care setting, providing an easier assessment of cognitive status for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation physicians, physical therapists, or clinicians less familiar PDD diagnosis or when formal comprehensive neuropsychological testing cannot be conducted. Similarly, ambulation and walking status was evaluated by asking the patient to walk back and fro 3 m (domain 8.6 of FUNDES-Adult) instead of tests such as the Timed up and Go test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%