2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The moving of high emission for biomass burning in China: View from multi-year emission estimation and human-driven forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Song et al (2020) found that the root mean square error (RMSE) of ERA5 RH was 3.85 % compared with the RH profile of the radiosonde. The above results show that RH from reanalysis data has good accuracy, and it has been widely used in various research fields (Sajadi et al, 2020;Tzanis et al, 2019;Xiao et al, 2020). The RH data of ERA5 used in this paper were divided into 37 layers vertically (1-1000 hPa).…”
Section: Era5mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Song et al (2020) found that the root mean square error (RMSE) of ERA5 RH was 3.85 % compared with the RH profile of the radiosonde. The above results show that RH from reanalysis data has good accuracy, and it has been widely used in various research fields (Sajadi et al, 2020;Tzanis et al, 2019;Xiao et al, 2020). The RH data of ERA5 used in this paper were divided into 37 layers vertically (1-1000 hPa).…”
Section: Era5mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It should be noted that the average  affected by aerosols brought by air mass 4 was small, which was comparable to that of air mass 1, indicating a high contribution of spherical aerosol particles, but LR was larger. By observing the trajectory of air mass 4, we found that it passed through Hubei Province with high industrial level (Wang et al, 2016) and Anhui Province with heavy pollution of biomass burning (Wu et al, 2020). The accompanying industrial and smoke aerosols, which are approximately spherical (Giannakaki et al, 2016;Müller et al, 2007) could be responsible for the smaller  .…”
Section: Influences Of Aerosol Sources On Lrmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Biomass burning is one of the important sources of PM, organic carbon (OC) and black carbon (BC) in the atmosphere (Wu et al, 2020). It also emits pollutant gases such as CO, SO2, NOx and HCN (Andreae and Merlet, 2001;Kalluri et al, 2020;Randel et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Main Aerosol Types Causing the Abnormal Variation Of Lrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the simulation and observations revealed near-surface extinctions as high as 0.4 km −1 during the winter, when aerosol pollution was frequent over eastern China, but the observed high extinctions of 0.2-0.4 km −1 at near-surface altitudes during summer and fall were underestimated by the model. Because biomass burning activities are predominantly concentrated in the summer and fall in eastern China and are critical determinants of aerosol pollution (Chen et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2017), the low biases of aerosol extinction profiles could partially stem from the model's use of biomass burning emissions that were derived from the GFED4 database. That emission inventory has been considered to be a lower estimate on a global scale compared to other commonly used databases constrained by satellite observations (Pan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Changes In Aerosol Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%