2018
DOI: 10.1101/405621
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multi-peak adaptive landscape of crocodylomorph body size evolution

Abstract: 7Background: Little is known about the long-term patterns of body size evolution in 2 8Crocodylomorpha, the > 200-million-year-old group that includes living crocodylians 2 9and their extinct relatives. Extant crocodylians are mostly large-bodied (3-7 m) 3 0 predators. However, extinct crocodylomorphs exhibit a wider range of phenotypes, and 3 1 many of the earliest taxa were much smaller (< 1.2 m). This suggests a pattern of size 3 2 increase through time that could be caused by multi-lineage evolutionary tre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that, even though this new generation of models can explain evolutionary patterns better than its predecessors (Table 2; see also Landis and Schraiber 2017), the history of echinoid body size seems to be too complex to be explained by a uniform process. This echoes the results of other explorations of body size evolution in comparative datasets (Price and Hopkins 2015; Benson et al 2018; Godoy et al 2019). This complexity is better accommodated by non-uniform macroevolutionary models, all of which attained higher AICc weights than those that assume that a single process governed evolution across the entire phylogeny (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our results show that, even though this new generation of models can explain evolutionary patterns better than its predecessors (Table 2; see also Landis and Schraiber 2017), the history of echinoid body size seems to be too complex to be explained by a uniform process. This echoes the results of other explorations of body size evolution in comparative datasets (Price and Hopkins 2015; Benson et al 2018; Godoy et al 2019). This complexity is better accommodated by non-uniform macroevolutionary models, all of which attained higher AICc weights than those that assume that a single process governed evolution across the entire phylogeny (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The evolution of crocodyliform body size cannot be reconciled with a simple Brownian motion model (Godoy et al 2019). Rather, the best model of body size evolution is one in which the adaptive landscape contains many unique optimal body sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, the best model of body size evolution is one in which the adaptive landscape contains many unique optimal body sizes. Specifically, shifts to larger sizes are often linked to more aquatic lifestyles (Godoy et al 2019). However, it has yet to be determined what selective pressure(s) caused these independent size shifts that are associated with living in water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015). Exhibiting a wide range of morphological variation, from gracile omnivores to pug-nosed herbivores, notosuchians contributed significantly to the highest peak of morphological disparity experienced by crocodyliforms (Wilberg 2017; Godoy 2019; Godoy et al . 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%