2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multi-Trajectory Theory of Adult Firesetting (M-TTAF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
165
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(116 reference statements)
10
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within-gender comparisons have shown that firesetters are distinguished by inappropriate attitudes towards fire, poorer emotion regulation and proneness to angry provocation, in addition to self-concept related factors (all-male prison study - Gannon et al, 2013). Based on these findings, coupled with the gender differences outlined above, it can be theorized that female firesetters would exhibit psychological vulnerabilities as theorized by Gannon et al (2012) in their M-TTAF model. Our study extends this research by comparing female firesetters, female offender controls, and male firesetters in prison settings.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within-gender comparisons have shown that firesetters are distinguished by inappropriate attitudes towards fire, poorer emotion regulation and proneness to angry provocation, in addition to self-concept related factors (all-male prison study - Gannon et al, 2013). Based on these findings, coupled with the gender differences outlined above, it can be theorized that female firesetters would exhibit psychological vulnerabilities as theorized by Gannon et al (2012) in their M-TTAF model. Our study extends this research by comparing female firesetters, female offender controls, and male firesetters in prison settings.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the wider offending literature calls for gender-specific programming (e.g., Blanchette and Browne, 2006), there have been theoretical developments intended to explain male and female firesetting. For example, the Multi-Trajectory Theory of Adult Firesetting (M-TTAF; Gannon et al, 2012) provides a framework for understanding the etiological, maintenance, and desistance factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stewart (1993) in line with the M-TTAF (Gannon, Ó Ciardha, Doley and Alleyne, 2012) noted that some female prisoners had multiple motives for firesetting including revenge (33%), attention seeking (20%), instrumental (20%), mental illness (10%), suicide (8%) and pyromania traits (5%). Additional motives in Tennent et al's (1971) study of female firesetter in-patients were conflict with authority and self-harm/destruction.…”
Section: Firesetting In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early theories of firesetting included Social Learning Theory (Gannon, Ó Ciardha, Doley, and Alleyne, 2012); Jackson's functional analysis model: Firesetting as the Only Viable Option (Jackson, Glass, and Hope, 1987;Jackson, 1994); and Fineman's (1995) dynamic behavioural theory. Social learning theorists view firesetting as the product of learning principles and a form of learnt hostility/aggression.…”
Section: Overview Of Theories Of Firesettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fritzon et al (2013), for example, argue that a more standardized evidence-based approach needs to be taken in devising and implementing treatment with firesetters. Towards this aim, researchers have recently begun to scrutinize how firesetters might best be assessed on fire-related variables (Ó Ciardha, Barnoux, Tyler, Mozova, & Gannon, 2015) and have developed an empirically informed theoretical framework examining the development and maintenance of firesetting (i.e., the MultiTrajectory Theory of Adult Firesetting [M-TTAF]; Gannon, Ó Ciardha, Doley, & Alleyne, 2012). The M-TTAF emphasizes the interaction of biological, social-cultural, and contextual factors associated with firesetting and emphasizes the importance of examining inappropriate fire interest and associated cognitions (see Fritzon et al, 2013;Gannon et al, 2012).…”
Section: Specialist Group Therapy For Psychological Factors Associatementioning
confidence: 99%