2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.09622
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multi-type Bisexual Galton-Watson Branching Process

Coralie Fritsch,
Denis Villemonais,
Nicolás Zalduendo

Abstract: In this work we study the bisexual Galton-Watson process with a finite number of types, where females and males mate according to a "mating function" and form couples of different types. We assume that this function is superadditive, which in simple words implies that two groups of females and males will form a larger number of couples together rather than separate. In the absence of a linear reproduction operator which is the key to understand the behaviour of the model in the asexual case, we build a concave… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weed survival probability is not notably affected by cross-pollination between resistant types ( Figure S3 a). For the sexual multitype Galton-Watson process, all theoretical results were derived exclusively for superadditive mating functions (Hull, 1998; Fritsch, Villemonais, and Zalduendo, 2022). However, random mating in a population of several types results in a non-superadditive mating function, not allowing any analysis of the process but solely simulations.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weed survival probability is not notably affected by cross-pollination between resistant types ( Figure S3 a). For the sexual multitype Galton-Watson process, all theoretical results were derived exclusively for superadditive mating functions (Hull, 1998; Fritsch, Villemonais, and Zalduendo, 2022). However, random mating in a population of several types results in a non-superadditive mating function, not allowing any analysis of the process but solely simulations.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%