Somatization processes are usually associated with a lack of insight or with emotional unawareness, especially in adolescents where the ability for self-reflection is beginning to mature. However, the extent to which different levels of insight explain variations in somatization remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate whether high-level emotional awareness (comprehension) but not low-level awareness (only attention) is needed to psychologically cope with suffering, thus leading to lower somatization. Specific predictions were: 1) High attention along with High comprehension will be associated with significantly lower frequency of somatic complaints than other combinations (Low attention and Low comprehension, or High attention but Low comprehension); 2) In absence of comprehension, no attention will be more optimal than attention only, because only-attention might work as an amplificatory of suffering without the possibility of processing it. Self-reports of meta-cognitive processes, somatization, and control variables were obtained from 264 adolescents from a non-clinical population (54.5% female; aged 12–18,
M
= 14.7, SD = 1.7). In line with expectations, results revealed significant differences in the effects of insight positions on somatization:
Attention+Comprehension
(
M
= 4.9, SE = 0.9) <
Nothing
(
M
= 7.1, SE = 0.3) <
Only attention
(
M
= 8.9, SE = 0.7). Compared to
Nothing
,
Attention+comprehension
was associated with significantly reduced somatic complaints (
B
= -2.2, p = 0.03, 95% CI -4,1 to 0.2). However,
Only attention
was associated with increased somatic complaints compared to the other two conditions (
B
= 1.8, p = 0.03, 95% CI 0.2 to 3.4;
B
= 4, CI 95% 1.6–6.3, p = 0.001, respectively). This highlights the role of higher-order awareness (i.e., comprehension or clarity) in the processing of suffering and stresses its value in the adaptive coping of emotional distress.