2018
DOI: 10.1002/pon.4892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multidisciplinary pediatric psycho‐oncology workforce: A national report on supervision for staff and training opportunities

Abstract: Objective: This paper presents data on licensure/certification status, supervision of multidisciplinary pediatric psychosocial staff, and training opportunities in pediatric cancer programs in the United States (U.S.), data that is critical to provide care aligned with the Standards of Psychosocial Care in Pediatric Cancer (Psychosocial Standards). Methods: An online survey of psychosocial care consistent with the Psychosocial Standards was completed from a national sample of pediatric cancer programs (144/2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report is from a center with readily accessible child psychiatry consultation and a robust multidisciplinary psychosocial team. Only 17% of pediatric oncology centers have embedded child psychiatry, 19 and there is no consensus about how to treat steroid side effects in this population. Availability of other psychosocial providers is also variable and affects child and family coping with all aspects of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This report is from a center with readily accessible child psychiatry consultation and a robust multidisciplinary psychosocial team. Only 17% of pediatric oncology centers have embedded child psychiatry, 19 and there is no consensus about how to treat steroid side effects in this population. Availability of other psychosocial providers is also variable and affects child and family coping with all aspects of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographical spread of studies is captured in the review findings. See Appendix IV for a full list of included studies 7,12–14,16,17,19–25,33–124 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research involving CLS was most prevalent in the USA (n = 84) representing 80% of the evidence 7,12–14,16,17,19–25,34,37–40,42,44,45,47–51,53–55,58–68,72,74–80,82,83,85–92,94–96,98,100–105,107–109,111–113,115–124 with research in Canada a distant second place (n=10) with 10% of the research 35,36,46,52,56,73,81,84,110,114 . The remainder of the evidence was from Australia, Europe, Mexico, and Taiwan with 1 to 2 articles from each country and 3 multicountry studies (Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Advancing them from paper to practice and idea to implementation requires a collective and coordinated effort. Recent initiatives have focused on raising awareness about the Standards, supporting their implementation within cancer care settings, and assessing their integration across disciplines to maximize efficiency and effectiveness (Jones et al, 2018;Kazak et al, 2018;Kazak et al, 2019;Scialla et al, 2017Scialla et al, , 2018Wiener, Canter, et al, 2020;Wiener, Kupst, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%