2005
DOI: 10.1515/text.2005.25.3.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multimodal mediation of power in the discourses of preschool story designers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discourse can be realized through interactions (Britsch, , ). An interaction is an event that occurs between two or more social actors for the purpose of knowledge reconstruction in science.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discourse can be realized through interactions (Britsch, , ). An interaction is an event that occurs between two or more social actors for the purpose of knowledge reconstruction in science.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this view, identity becomes multidimensional as one definition of “what we are doing” (Gee, , p. 31) collides or resonates with another. Those participants who synthesize the available modes in the same way may enact or recognize one identity configuration (Britsch, ) while an alternative synthesis recognizes a different identity and proceeds on that basis. As a result, modes may be “loaded with meanings” (Machin, , p. 21) that are not mutually recognizable to discourse participants as resources for enacting mutually defined social practices (Gee, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this research demonstrates that young children do have complex (and contradictory) storied selves, there has been less research that pinpoints how storied selves are discursively constituted (for exceptions see Britsch, 2005;Wohlend, 2009). To answer this question, we drew on the tools of critical discourse analysis (Fairclough, 1995;Gee, 2009;Kress, 2004;Rogers, 2011) to examine the discursive contours of children's literate identities across multiple domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%