2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multiple effects of combined tools in computer-based learning environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A computerized graphic organizer can help learners construct node-link assemblies such as knowledge maps and can be easily adjusted or quickly corrected; computer-assisted mapping may also have positive effects on learners' reading abilities (Liu et al 2010), especially when the software can use the correct function to review students' summaries (Chang et al 2001). Some software also provides automatic functions to support the construction of maps (e.g., Chang, et al 2001;Pirnay-Dummer and Ifenthaler 2011;Juarez Collazo et al 2015). Note that some of the above studies used premade graphic organizers to foster students' text comprehension (and even a nonautomatic premade graphic organizer; Colliot and Jamet 2018), while others had learners compare maps with their ideas or input text data in a framework proved by the software (e.g., Ponce and Mayer 2014a, b).…”
Section: External Representations Generated From Electronic Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A computerized graphic organizer can help learners construct node-link assemblies such as knowledge maps and can be easily adjusted or quickly corrected; computer-assisted mapping may also have positive effects on learners' reading abilities (Liu et al 2010), especially when the software can use the correct function to review students' summaries (Chang et al 2001). Some software also provides automatic functions to support the construction of maps (e.g., Chang, et al 2001;Pirnay-Dummer and Ifenthaler 2011;Juarez Collazo et al 2015). Note that some of the above studies used premade graphic organizers to foster students' text comprehension (and even a nonautomatic premade graphic organizer; Colliot and Jamet 2018), while others had learners compare maps with their ideas or input text data in a framework proved by the software (e.g., Ponce and Mayer 2014a, b).…”
Section: External Representations Generated From Electronic Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Course content development looks at instructional materials and technology (Czerkawski, 2013). According to Collazo et al (2015), instructional designers should consider what most learners seem to use as learning tools regardless of the tool delivery mode available. For developing the course's web site, a detailed content analysis is very important for modularizing the content into small chucks (Vrasidas et al, 2000).…”
Section: Delivery Stage (Development Implementation and Evaluation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies detected positive effects of factual questions, asking learners to repeat provided (important) information (e.g. Andre, 1979; Duchastel, 1981; Frase & Schwartz, 1975; Juarez Collazo, Elen, & Clarebout, 2015; Reynolds & Anderson, 1982; Roelle & Berthold, 2017; Roelle, Rahimkhani‐Sagvand, & Berthold, 2017). For example, Duchastel and Nungester (1984) demonstrated positive effects on retention when questions such as “What nationality was Prince Albert?” were inserted at the end of a learning text on the life of Queen Victoria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%