This study examined the effects of group training and several environmental and personal factors on 515 students' decisions to initiate creative investigations in new gifted education programs. Forty-eight groups of above average ability students in grades 3-8 were randomly , assigned to either control or experimental groups. Students in the treatment group received seven lessons in organizing a creative investigation. Initiation of a creative investigation was the dependent variable. Parsonal variables and group membership were entered into a hierarchical discriminant function analysis in an effort to identify the strength of the treatment beyond the personal variables of grade, sex, self-efficacy, learning style preferences, achievement, and academic aptitude. All eight predictor variables proved significant and accounted for 22% of the variance between groups.One of the primary goals of many gifted education programs is the development and enhancement of gifted behaviors and/or self-directed creative problem-solving skills. These programs often stress the topical and temporal nature of such behaviors and the role of the school in teaching students how to develop them. In many programs using this approach, giftedness is viewed as an interaction of above average ability, task commitment, and creativity brought to bear upon a specific performance area (Renzulli, 1985).Various training activities have been incorporated into programs designed to develop gifted behaviors and independent creative problem-solving skills (Betts ). In these programs students are encouraged to learn these behaviors by becoming involved in self-selected investigations and research studies. The techniques of real world problem solving (Renzulli, 1982) and creative problem solving (Feldhusen & Treffinger, 1985) are frequently suggested as teaching tools that can instruct students in the process of independent or self-directed study.The Problem Research has demonstrated that less than half of the students who participate in a new Enrichment Triad program, a programming model that stresses creative productivity, initiate a creative investigation during the first year of the program (Reis, 1981;Gubbins, 1982). Various research studies have been conducted to examine the influence of personal variables such as self-concept, locus of control, academic achievement and aptitude, sex, and self-efficacy on students' decisions to participate in creative projects (Delisle, 1981;Reis, 1981;Schack, 1986;Starko, 1986). Other studies have examined the administrative and instructional practices that appear to encourage or discourage participation in creative investigations (Cooper, 1983;Gubbins, 1982). One may conclude from these studies that personal and environmental factors can work either in favor of or against a student's decision to engage in self-selected independent or small group investigations.None of the studies mentioned above have attempted to investigate the effects of proactive measures that may influence a student's decision to begin work on...