2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.11771
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The muon $g-2$ and $W$-mass anomalies explained and the electroweak vacuum stabilised by extending the minimal Type-II seesaw

Abstract: The recent precise measurement of the W -mass by the CDF II collaboration is indicative of new physics beyond the Standard Model. On the other hand, a resolution of the longstanding muon g − 2 anomaly also calls for additional dynamics. In this work, we accommodate the two aforementioned anomalies in an extension of the minimal Type-II seesaw model. That is, the minimal Type-II model is augmented with an additional doubly charged scalar and vector leptons. While a chirality-flip of the vector leptons can predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly,the Yukawa couplings in equation ( 2) can also influence and modify these branching ratios along with the muon as well as electron anomalous magnetic moments. However, in this model, we avoided such situation as the contributions to these decay processes and both the anomalous magnetic moments [55,56] are negligible due to large fermionic and scalar masses. FIG.…”
Section: Neutrino Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly,the Yukawa couplings in equation ( 2) can also influence and modify these branching ratios along with the muon as well as electron anomalous magnetic moments. However, in this model, we avoided such situation as the contributions to these decay processes and both the anomalous magnetic moments [55,56] are negligible due to large fermionic and scalar masses. FIG.…”
Section: Neutrino Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in Refs. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] have attempted to provide a common explanation for both muon (g − 2) and W-boson mass anomaly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for this large deviation from the SM W -mass prediction, new physics seems required. An interesting example is provided by neutrino mass generation schemes, which often require new particles that may shift the W-boson mass appreciably at the radiative level [40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%