2009
DOI: 10.1172/jci38075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The muscle-specific microRNA miR-206 blocks human rhabdomyosarcoma growth in xenotransplanted mice by promoting myogenic differentiation

Abstract: Many microRNAs (miRNAs), posttranscriptional regulators of numerous cellular processes and developmental events, are downregulated in tumors. However, their role in tumorigenesis remains largely unknown. In this work, we examined the role of the muscle-specific miRNAs miR-1 and miR-206 in human rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), a soft tissue sarcoma thought to arise from skeletal muscle progenitors. We have shown that miR-1 was barely detectable in primary RMS of both the embryonal and alveolar subtypes and that both mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
290
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
21
290
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerous reported roles of miR122 include regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis 19,20 , hepatitis C virus replication 49 and maintenance of the adult liver phenotype 21 . Specific miRNAs are often involved in the differentiation of specific cells and tissues 50 . As miR122 is liver-specific, we reasoned that this miRNA may have a role in the differentiation of normal hepatocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerous reported roles of miR122 include regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis 19,20 , hepatitis C virus replication 49 and maintenance of the adult liver phenotype 21 . Specific miRNAs are often involved in the differentiation of specific cells and tissues 50 . As miR122 is liver-specific, we reasoned that this miRNA may have a role in the differentiation of normal hepatocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the regulatory molecules are the same and the biological outcomes share unifying principles, the precise mechanisms that dictate the final execution of one or another response are far from being elucidated. The regulation of the different outcomes of MET activation, as well as the definition of their biological specificity, could depend on signal modifiers that are endowed with a tissue-restricted distribution (including, as recently demonstrated, microRNAs 149,150,151,152,153 ) or on dedicated protein interaction networks, and could be further tuned by transcriptional modulation. The ongoing development of new technologies is certainly one prerequisite for unravelling the complexity of these issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical data show that MET overexpression, in the absence of gene amplifi cation, is the most frequent cause of constitutive MET activation in human tumors and often correlates with poor prognosis. Overexpression can be caused by several factors, such as hypoxia ( 19 ), activation of upstream oncogenes ( 20,21 ), inactivation of tumor suppressor genes ( 22 ), or loss of miRNAs ( 23,24 ). MET gene amplifi cation, which drives increased expression and constitutive receptor activation, has been described in selected histotypes such as gastroesophageal, colorectal, endometrial, and lung carcinomas, glioblastomas, and medulloblastomas (reviewed in ref.…”
Section: Met/hgf and Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%