The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School

Abstract

The study of institutional myths has been central to organizational sociology, cultural sociology, and the sociology of education for 30 years. This article examines how the myth concept has been used and develops neglected possibilities by asking: What happens when myths become incarnate, and how does this occur? In other words, what happens when conformity to a rationalized cultural ideal such as ''accountability'' is no longer symbolic but is given tangible flesh? Data from a two-year ethnography of an urban elementary school provide answers and reveal ''recoupling'' processes through which institutional myths and organizational practices that were once loosely connected become tightly linked. In the school studied here, recoupling accountability with classroom practices created a phenomenon that teachers labeled ''turmoil.'' The findings advance our understanding of the micro-sociological foundations of institutional theory by ''inhabiting'' institutionalism with people, their work activities, social interactions, and meaning-making processes.

Sustaining change towards racial equity through cycles of inquiry

“…The type of data provided (Horn et al, 2015), leadership styles and the framing of conversations about the purpose of incorporating data into every-day practices (Hallett, 2010;Marsh, Bush-Mecenas, Strunk, Lincove, & Huguet, 2017;Spillane, Parise, & Sherer, 2011) and the quality of social interactions during data use matter greatly, especially when issues of trust, power, and professional identity come into play (Datnow & Castellano, 2000;Marsh & Farrell, 2015). The quandary posed by Goren (2012), "data, data, and more data-what's an educator to do?"…”

Compliance or pragmatism: how do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries

“…Perceiving individual behaviour through an 'institutional' perspective remains an underresearched area. One of the few studies in this area has been carried out by Hallett (2010), who shows that 'institutional myths' and 'organisational practices' in secondary education, which were once uncoupled, are again tightly linked in times of turmoil. …”

Implementing Intelligence-Led Policing: An Application of Loose-Coupling Theory

“…Implementing ILP requires police agencies to shift away from the traditional practices of routine patrol and responding to calls for service (Ratcliffe, 2008). This study is grounded within a loose coupling theoretical framework, which argues there is a gap between what an organization is expected to do and what is actually being done (Hallet, 2010). The implementation of ILP is examined by identifying aspects representative of police agency behavior that may contribute to the connection, or disconnection, between what police are expected to do and what is actually being done with respect to ILP.…”