2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The myth of agency and patient choice in health care? The case of drug treatments to prevent coronary disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have no information on patients' treatment preferences, which are not predictable from patients' age, sex or risk factor status and may not accord with guideline recommendations [43], [44]. However there is little evidence that general practitioners take account of patients' preferences when starting preventive treatments [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have no information on patients' treatment preferences, which are not predictable from patients' age, sex or risk factor status and may not accord with guideline recommendations [43], [44]. However there is little evidence that general practitioners take account of patients' preferences when starting preventive treatments [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shared decision-making model brings us out of the canonical paradigm of agency relations without falling into the model where the patient is the only decider and the (benevolent) doctor is a simple technical adviser (Gafni et al 1998). This conception of the doctor-patient interaction appears to be more in line with the diagnoses and therapies actually observed in health centres (Bryan et al 2006;Moumjid et al 2003).…”
Section: Empowerment Of the Patient And Market Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[48][49][50][51] Choice How much choice is the patient given from their physician, provider and payer? [48,55,56] Shared decision making How is the patient involved in medical decision making? How does the physician influence other decisions of the patient?…”
Section: Antecedents To Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual framework for 'informed choice' is that patients have the relevant information regarding the advantages and disadvantages of all the possible treatment courses in accordance with their own beliefs [48]. This is in contrast to the paternalism of central Europe [2], the centralized decision making of the UK [56] and Canada, and even the managed care movement in the USA that aims to constrain the availability of patient choice.…”
Section: Choicementioning
confidence: 99%