2000
DOI: 10.1484/j.rb.5.100752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myth of Hiberno-Latin Exegesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 Bischoff 1954;Gorman 2000;Ó Cróinín 2000;Contreni 2012:522-3.64 Stern 1910;Breen 1996;Picard 2003. In the Vetus Latina edition it is given the siglum W.65 McNamara 1994; a new edition is being prepared by Rittmueller.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 Bischoff 1954;Gorman 2000;Ó Cróinín 2000;Contreni 2012:522-3.64 Stern 1910;Breen 1996;Picard 2003. In the Vetus Latina edition it is given the siglum W.65 McNamara 1994; a new edition is being prepared by Rittmueller.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gorman criticised Bischoff's reasoning and has gone on to assault the entire edifice, questioning the inclusion of texts that were already recognised as Irish long before Bischoff. 100 Both the particular and the general have brought forward responses, defending Ireland's claim to so many unstudied texts and the coherence of Bischoff's catalogue. 101 I cannot see that there is any reason to treat the catalogue as a slate of candidates, who are either all adopted as Irish or all rejected as pseudo-Irish.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%