1982
DOI: 10.1215/00182702-14-4-461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The myth of the Darwin-Marx letter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He withdrew his endorsement from the letterhead of a freethinking American journal, the Index, when its political line became discomforting to him. He refused Edward Aveling's request to dedicate Student's Darwin (1881) to him (Feuer 1975;Colp 1982).…”
Section: Public Appearancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He withdrew his endorsement from the letterhead of a freethinking American journal, the Index, when its political line became discomforting to him. He refused Edward Aveling's request to dedicate Student's Darwin (1881) to him (Feuer 1975;Colp 1982).…”
Section: Public Appearancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that Marx was impressed by Darwin's Origin of Species, although the idea that he went so far as to ask permission from Darwin to dedicate a volume of Capital to him turns out to be a myth (Colp, 1982). Marx mentions Darwin in a few places in Capital but on close examination there is much in the Marxian theoretical system that is antagonistic to Darwinian evolutionary ideas.…”
Section: Examples Of Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as this article demonstrates, there is no direct documentary evidence to support these claims in anything written by Darwin or his contemporaries—instead, scrutiny of such evidence suggests that Annie's death had no connection at all with Darwin's loss of faith. Therefore we argue that the ‘Annie hypothesis' should be classified, along with ‘Darwin’s finches' (Sulloway, 1982) the Darwin‐Marx letter (Colp, 1982), the death‐bed conversion (Moore, 1994) and ‘Darwin’s delay’ (van Wyhe, 2007) as a modern Darwin myth, which has arisen only in recent times and was wholly unknown to Darwin, his contemporaries and generations of subsequent commentators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%