2005
DOI: 10.1080/09687590500248399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The myth of transition: contractualizing disability in the sheltered workshop

Abstract: This paper investigates notions of transition and independence, as well as the current circumstances that detain countless disabled people in employment endeavors that not only pay meager wages but also cement a lifelong servitude to the workshop. Sheltered workshops exist on the basis and replication of a structure that incarcerates disabled people within vocational-like settings. This paper begins a discussion of the social contract that occurs between the disabled person in the workshop. The workshop is no … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants ardently discussed the entries in the list -controversial issues turned out to be the 'sesame halva', the 'wafers' (different kinds of sweets) and the 'house painting services' (National Council on Integration of People with Disabilities 2005a, 2-3), how should the list be composed, who should be entitled to do it (National Council on Integration of People with Disabilities 2005b, 3), etc. One cannot read anywhere in the minutes anything critical about the segregational principle upon which such enterprises are based (CIL 2003, 52-3;Gill, 2005).…”
Section: Participants and Their Depoliticisation And Depersonalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants ardently discussed the entries in the list -controversial issues turned out to be the 'sesame halva', the 'wafers' (different kinds of sweets) and the 'house painting services' (National Council on Integration of People with Disabilities 2005a, 2-3), how should the list be composed, who should be entitled to do it (National Council on Integration of People with Disabilities 2005b, 3), etc. One cannot read anywhere in the minutes anything critical about the segregational principle upon which such enterprises are based (CIL 2003, 52-3;Gill, 2005).…”
Section: Participants and Their Depoliticisation And Depersonalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the article by Sarkis et al does not describe in more detail the situation at the Centre such as the salaries of disabled people and it does not give evidence as to how attitudes toward -the disabled‖ have changed. If it is organized like sheltered workshops, there is a large body of literature that questions the practice [53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Prasertsubpakij and Nitivattananon In Their Article Evaluatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where else would individuals be forced to clean the school except in a special education class? I discuss this issue in another publication (Gill 2005). …”
Section: The Case Of Kalie Mcarthurmentioning
confidence: 95%