The myth of vaccination and autism spectrum

Abstract

Background Among all of the studied potential causes of autism, vaccines have received some of the most scrutiny and have been the topic of many evidence-based studies. These efforts have led the great majority of scientists, physicians, and public health researchers to refute causation between vaccines and autism. Rationale This presumed association and concern has been a major contributor to parents’ refusal to immunize their children and has become a major threat to public health in secluded populations over the last two decades, even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. With the emergence of COVID-19 immunizations, sentiments towards this topic were addressed as a public health concern that may influence the ability to overcome the Corona virus worldwide. Scientific review of data Despite the overwhelming data demonstrating that there is no link between vaccines and autism, many parents are hesitant to immunize their children because of the alleged association. Other contributing factors to the myths and conspiracy theories surrounding the association between vaccines and autism include the fact that the diagnosis of autism is typically made after the age of receiving the main childhood immunizations, as well as the occasional occurrence of regression after the age of first year vaccinations. In spite of vast evidence that the main contribution to the increase in incidence is from improvement of the diagnostic process, this rapid and publicized rise in autism diagnoses feeds parental concerns regarding any medical intervention that may be associated with the health of their children. Recommandations It is plausible that with more evidence-based studies linking autism to specific etiologies the myth will diminish and disappear eventually. In an era where conspiracy theories are prevalent on social media, it is critical that evidence-based studies relating autism to specific etiologies be made public, and that information concerning autism diagnosis and causes be made more readily available through social media and parental organizations.

Unraveling Childhood Vaccination Hesitancy: A Thematic Analysis of the Perceptions of Highly Educated Mothers in Kazakhstan

“…Worrying about the adverse side effects of vaccinations is closely linked to the topic of misconceptions about vaccines. As mentioned previously, ideas that childhood vaccines cause autism, autoimmune or neurodegenerative diseases, and death are incorrect and have been proven so by many studies [30][31][32]. However, as shown in the current study, some parents also claim that there are not enough studies on the adverse effects of vaccines.…”

Heterogeneity thwarts autism explanatory power: A proposal for endophenotypes

“…Importantly, in large part because there are no sufficiently effective treatments for autism as a whole, bogus “drug” regimens, dubious behavioral treatments, and unfounded beliefs have caused harm. In particular, the belief that vaccines cause autism has led to illness and even death ( 86 ).…”

Development and evaluation of three automated media pooling and molecular diagnostic systems for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

“…However, the majority of these studies involved only a mock sample evaluation. Large-scale pooled testing (approximately 40,000–250,000 samples) has already been implemented in clinical laboratories or screening programs for schools or universities using pool sizes of 5, 8, 10, or 24, depending on expected test positivity ( 7 – 9 ). China utilized pooled testing with pool sizes of 3, 5, or 10 for community screening that targeted >1 million residents in moderate-risk areas, while people in high-risk areas were tested individually to control local outbreaks ( 10 , 11 ).…”