1977
DOI: 10.1080/00131727709336228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myths of Rural School and District Consolidation: Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By 1930, the number of local school districts in the United States had reached its high point-in excess of 125,000 separate units. By 1976, this number had been reduced to approximately 16,000 (Sher, 1976). This drastic reduction in the number of units of a specialized local government took place in a manner so subtle as virtually to escape the notice of political analysts.…”
Section: More Recent Comprehensive Studies (Glass and Smith 1978; Smmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By 1930, the number of local school districts in the United States had reached its high point-in excess of 125,000 separate units. By 1976, this number had been reduced to approximately 16,000 (Sher, 1976). This drastic reduction in the number of units of a specialized local government took place in a manner so subtle as virtually to escape the notice of political analysts.…”
Section: More Recent Comprehensive Studies (Glass and Smith 1978; Smmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, reforms that reflected local perspectives were received more positively (McLaughlin, 1982). Standardized reform negates the rural school's greatest educational advantage, its intimate connection to community (Haller & Monk, 1988;Rosenfeld & Sher, 1977;Sher & Tompkins, 1977). Another major rural education research review stated, "the drive to make rural schools more centralized, standardized, bureaucratized, and professionalized has nearly robbed them of their distinctiveness and has failed to deliver on the promise of improved quality of education" (Kannapel & DeYoung, 1999, p. 76).…”
Section: Research On North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%