The N. P. Goulandris Collection of Early Cycladic Art

Vermeule, Emily; Vermeule, Cornelius; D̲oumas, Christos; Preziosi, Patricia G.

doi:10.2307/4347161

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even conservative legal scholars emphasize that judicial decisions result from 'interpretive choice' . 1149 In international law, interpretative methods leave room for discretion as well. Martti Koskenniemi argues that the sources of international law cannot be identified in an apolitical way.1150 Common norms do not eliminate the need for evaluation, and hence reliance on 'essentially contested -political -principles' .1151 International law, according to Helmut Aust, only requires 'convergence at a very high level of abstraction' .1152 The ascertainment of the object and purpose1153 of a treaty, for instance, is viewed by some scholars as an 'enigma' .1154 Similar difficulties apply to other methods listed in the vclt.…”

Section: 1mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Need for Interpretative Methods in International Law

Ammann¹

2020

Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License. chapter 5 The Need for Interpretative Methods in International Law Misuse of international law by national jurisdictions may have farreaching negative consequences beyond the specific facts of the case over the long term. Such misuse as this promotes development of bad law, which runs the risk of being cited and adopted by other national jurisdictions.981 ∵ 981 Weill (n 61) 67.

show abstract

Section: 1mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Need for Interpretative Methods in International Law

Ammann¹

2020

Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Vermeule himself has admitted that his institutional theory is based on a consequentialist approach; 90 but our political institutions are not always justified in such terms. Jeremy Waldron's distinction between outcomerelated and process-related reasons seems highly relevant in this context.…”

Section: Institutional Analysis Cannot Be Self-standingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The New Constitutionalism

Győrfi¹

2016

Against the New Constitutionalism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1688 seven English peers sent a letter of invitation to William of Orange, the Protestant king of Holland, and indicated to him that the country wanted political change. After William had landed in England and the reigning King, James II, had fled the country, the Convention of Lords and Commons declared that the throne was vacant and officially offered it to William and his wife, Mary. However, the Crown the Parliament offered to them was not the same as before: by adopting the Bill of Rights 1689, the Parliament imposed strong limits on the prerogative powers of the Crown. The conflict between the Crown and Parliament, which was at the centre of the political controversies in the seventeenth century, ended with the victory of the Parliament. The settlement between William and the Parliament transformed England into a limited constitutional monarchy. 1 Although the English (and later the British) constitution has undergone many changes since then, the 1688 settlement has laid down the foundations of a new, distinctive constitutional arrangement with the principle of parliamentary supremacy at its heart. The doctrine of parliamentary supremacy received its most influential exposition in AV Dicey's treaty on constitutional law in the nineteenth century. 2 The Orthodox Model of Parliamentary Supremacy can be characterized by three main tenets: 1.1.1.1 Monistic constitutional architecture Although in functional terms one can speak about constitutional laws, in legal terms there is no formal distinction between 'constitutional statutes' 1

show abstract

“…According to Strabo (13.1.26) he decided, in 323 bc, to build a new temple to Athena at Troy. 57 Troy's imperial visitors, attracted by the reputation of the site as presented both in cultural memory and in the literary tradition, responded, although in diff erent ways, to the accounts of the actions of earlier visitors. 49 Pilgrimage and tourism to Troy and its related sites continued on a modest scale for over a century.…”

Section: Troy the Troy Story And Visitors To Troymentioning

confidence: 99%

Commemoration and Pilgrimage in the Ancient World: Troy and the Stratigraphy of Cultural Memory

Minchin¹

2012

Greece & Rome

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article takes up the subject of shared memory and its interaction with landscape, with specific reference to Troy, to Homer's Iliad, and to the tradition of ‘pilgrimage’ to Troy and its environs that evolved in the ancient world in response to the Trojan War story. Over the course of centuries this particular location on the Hellespont, a Bronze Age site, exercised a particular fascination, thanks to memories – no doubt gravely distorted – of a great siege by combined Greek forces eager to avenge, as legend tells it, the abduction of Helen. A few centuries later, the site became a destination for ‘pilgrims’ who were eager to see for themselves the landscape of Troy and the Troad and to experience for themselves, physically and emotionally, certain actions that were attributed to the heroes of the so-called Trojan War.

show abstract

The N. P. Goulandris Collection of Early Cycladic Art

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

The Need for Interpretative Methods in International Law

The Need for Interpretative Methods in International Law

The New Constitutionalism

Commemoration and Pilgrimage in the Ancient World: Troy and the Stratigraphy of Cultural Memory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About