Linguistic categories have been shown to influence perceptual discrimination, to do so preferentially in the right visual field, to fail to do so when competing demands are made on verbal memory, and to vary with the color-term boundaries of different languages. However, because there are strong commonalities across languages in the placement of color-term boundaries, the question remains open whether observed categorical perception for color can be entirely a result of learned categories or may rely to some degree on innate ones. We show here that lateralized color categorical perception can be entirely the result of learned categories. In a visual search task, reaction times to targets were faster in the right than the left visual field when the target and distractor colors, initially sharing the same linguistic term (e.g., "blue"), became between-category colors after training (i.e., when two different shades of blue had each acquired a new name). A control group, whose conditions exactly matched those of the experimental group except that no new categories were introduced, did not show this effect, establishing that the effect was not dependent on increased familiarity with either the color stimuli or the task. The present results show beyond question that lateralized categorical perception of color can reflect strictly learned color categories, even artificially learned categories that violate both universal tendencies in color naming and the categorization pattern of the language of the subject.category learning | Whorf hypothesis | nature versus nurture | linguistic relativity A long-standing "Whorfian" debate over the relation between language and thought has gained momentum in recent years with an increasing number of studies demonstrating the involvement of linguistic information in categorical perception of color (1-18).* For example, speakers of English judge colors that straddle the English category boundary between green and blue to be less similar than do speakers of Tarahumara, a UtoAztecan language of Mexico that uses a single word for these colors (1). Unlike English, Russian makes a distinction between lighter blues (goluboy) and darker blues (siniy), and Russian speakers are faster, compared with English speakers, in discriminating two colors when they fall into different categories, one goluboy and the other siniy, than when they belong to the same category (6). More recent findings provide a different perspective, suggesting that language is disproportionately engaged in the discrimination of colors presented in the right visual field (RVF) as compared with the left visual field (LVF) (5,7,8,10,11). Specifically, discrimination of colors from two different lexical categories (e.g., a green among blues) is faster than discrimination of colors from the same lexical category (e.g., one green among tokens of a different green), but only (or predominantly) when the between-category colors are presented in the RVF. [Significant color categorical perception (CP) has also been found in the LFV (7, ...