The Naming of Independent Churches in the 21st Century: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Charismatic Churches in South Africa

Abstract

South Africa is a democratic country, wherein every individual has the right to belong to any religious community. Churches in the Bible were not given specific names, but the church’s location was used to refer to that church. Mainline churches named their churches using doctrinal convictions, and some used the names of their founders. However, leaders of charismatic churches in South Africa are more creative in naming churches, using names that communicate what the church stands for or a name depicting an expected contribution of the church to the community in which it is based. This article discusses the naming patterns and practices of three church categories as representative examples: the early church (in the Bible), mainline churches, and charismatic churches in South Africa. Using content analysis as a qualitative approach, data were gathered by analysing content from sources such as the Bible, the South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms, and content posted on Facebook and YouTube, while critical discourse analysis and text analysis constituted the analytical framework. The study found that there has been a major shift in the naming practices of churches in the three categories.

Unveiling Shadows: Tracking Youth Disengagement from the Church [Menyingkap Bayangan: Melacak Penyebab Keterpisahan Kaum Muda dari Gereja]

“…24 Majola focuses on this trend, highlighting both the decline of mainline churches and the growth of Pentecostalism in Africa, focusing specifically on South Africa. 25 Ferreira and Chipenyu further elucidate the global nature of this phenomenon. 26 These insights emphasise the urgency for mainline churches to comprehend the underlying causes, enabling them to address challenges proactively and continue to play a meaningful societal role.…”

“…33 On the other end of the scale is Generation Z's (born 1997-2012) prominence as consumers. 34 The demographic shifts, pose a central challenge in youth ministry as the coexistence of millennials (ages [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and Generation Z within the church reflects an evolving landscape at the intersection of youth and faith.…”