2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6141966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NAO Variability Prediction and Forecasting with Multiple Time Scales Driven by ENSO Using Machine Learning Approaches

Abstract: Machine learning methods have now become an optional technique in Earth science research, and such data-driven solutions have also made tremendous progress in weather forecasting and climate prediction in recent years. Since climate data are typically time series, the neural network layers, which can identify the intrinsic connections between the points of the sequence and features in two-dimensional data, perform particularly well for climate prediction. The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is a prominent atm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, the forecast capability of NAO-MCD remains strong over time, even rebounding at a 6-month lead time. This rebound is not a coincidence; in our previous study using machine learning methods to predict NAO variability, there was a rebound in prediction accuracy at both the 6-month and 12-month lead times [16]. A possible explanation is that the most salient changes in Atlantic SLP values occur at 6-month and 1-year intervals [58].…”
Section: Monthly Nao Forecastmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, the forecast capability of NAO-MCD remains strong over time, even rebounding at a 6-month lead time. This rebound is not a coincidence; in our previous study using machine learning methods to predict NAO variability, there was a rebound in prediction accuracy at both the 6-month and 12-month lead times [16]. A possible explanation is that the most salient changes in Atlantic SLP values occur at 6-month and 1-year intervals [58].…”
Section: Monthly Nao Forecastmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Javier et al [15] trained various autoregressive and supervised models, including the integrated moving average model (ARIMA) and LSTM, to predict the NAO for the next week. Mu et al used the RF-Var model to predict the monthly NAO variability based on the Niño indices, and the AccNet model to forecast the short-term SLP based on the NAO, the SST, and other physical variables [16]. However, these models have the following limitations: limited to a single (or few) predictor, ignoring significant multivariate predictors related to the complex air-sea coupling mechanisms underpinning NAO [14,15]; low confidence in the model, with little involvement in predictor interactions and physical explanations [16]; given the short forecast time of the models, it is not capable of making long-term forecasts [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%