2007
DOI: 10.1080/13507480701249091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nation as a Community Born of War? Symbolic Strategies and Popular Reception of Public Statues in Late Nineteenth-Century Western European Capitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What makes Turkey a singular case among other authoritarian nations in Europe in the early 20th century is the complete novelty of figurative public monuments since the Islamic order under the Ottoman Empire had banned on all forms of idolatry. 2 This contrast also holds true for the more democratic states in Europe such as France and Britain where the erection, demolition and re-erection of public monuments had played a key role in nation-building since the 18th century (Cohen, 1989;Mosse, 1977;Rausch, 2007). 3 Given the absence of this aesthetic form in the Ottoman Empire, the erection of these symbols in early republican Turkey (1923)(1924)(1925)(1926)(1927)(1928)(1929)(1930)(1931)(1932)(1933)(1934)(1935)(1936)(1937)(1938) constituted a symbolic event itself as it invented a new tradition by representing the birth of a new nation with a pro-Westernised, modern, secular culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What makes Turkey a singular case among other authoritarian nations in Europe in the early 20th century is the complete novelty of figurative public monuments since the Islamic order under the Ottoman Empire had banned on all forms of idolatry. 2 This contrast also holds true for the more democratic states in Europe such as France and Britain where the erection, demolition and re-erection of public monuments had played a key role in nation-building since the 18th century (Cohen, 1989;Mosse, 1977;Rausch, 2007). 3 Given the absence of this aesthetic form in the Ottoman Empire, the erection of these symbols in early republican Turkey (1923)(1924)(1925)(1926)(1927)(1928)(1929)(1930)(1931)(1932)(1933)(1934)(1935)(1936)(1937)(1938) constituted a symbolic event itself as it invented a new tradition by representing the birth of a new nation with a pro-Westernised, modern, secular culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example. historian HelkeRausch (2007) analyzes the memorials and statues of nineteenthcentury national heroes as expressions of national ideals, popular war myths, and intentional national propaganda. Over the past two decades.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%