The National Innovation Ecosystem of Israel

Tabansky, Lior; Israel, Isaac Ben

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18986-4_3

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Research Of Existing Solutions Of the Problem1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[36] National innovation ecosystem -consists of six main blocks: infrastructure, intellectual capital, integrity, incentives, interaction and institutional coordination, innovation. [37] National Innovation Ecosystem -based on the strategic principle of quality, not quantity and consists: IDF, domestic and foreign business R&D, defense R&D, public research universities and government agencies characterized by geographical and institutional proximity, as well as relative independence and relative independence initiative, ingenuity and experimentation that complement institutional arrangements.…”

Section: Research Of Existing Solutions Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Six Helix Model Of The Innovation Ecosystem Of Research And Innovation

Никитин

2022

ISJMEF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Research Of Existing Solutions Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Six Helix Model Of The Innovation Ecosystem Of Research And Innovation

Никитин

2022

ISJMEF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Unboxing the imaginary: Typology of future imagination techniques in high-tech development

Samimian-Darash,

Sheniak,

Rotem

2024

Soc Stud Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When the future is connected to the term ‘imagination’, it is generally presented through the concept of the ‘imaginary’—that is, an image of the future that is related to a grand social image. In this article, we discuss the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries and argue that although this concept provides a needed perspective that allows scholars to unpack imaginaries associated with technological futures, it often features very broad concepts, hindering investigation of the ongoing dynamics of the actual acts of imagining and imagination. In contrast, we are interested in examining the processes and practices of imagination of socio-technical futures. Attempting to extend and deepen the development of this prevalent approach in STS, we make three incremental claims. First, future imaginaries should be addressed as a product of a process of imagination, not just in their final stable states. Second, exploring the process of future imagination reveals the effect of different temporalities—patterns of future imagination that expand the common singular far-future imaginary. Third, using a temporality-based analysis, we can identify different future planning techniques and practices in terms of their levels of formality and institutionalization.

show abstract

The National Innovation Ecosystem of Israel

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Six Helix Model Of The Innovation Ecosystem Of Research And Innovation

Six Helix Model Of The Innovation Ecosystem Of Research And Innovation

Unboxing the imaginary: Typology of future imagination techniques in high-tech development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About