2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0768-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial

Abstract: BackgroundThe role of tonsillectomy in the management of adult tonsillitis remains uncertain and UK regional variation in tonsillectomy rates persists. Patients, doctors and health policy makers wish to know the costs and benefits of tonsillectomy against conservative management and whether therapy can be better targeted to maximise benefits and minimise risks of surgery, hence maximising cost-effective use of resources. NATTINA incorporates the first attempt to map current NHS referral criteria against other … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients: ENT staff provided patients, attending referral visits, who met the proposed NATTINA eligibility criteria, a participant information sheet (PIS), considered to be the most efficient form of recruitment. One of the authors (LM) contacted patients who expressed interest and arranged interviews at a time and location convenient for them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients: ENT staff provided patients, attending referral visits, who met the proposed NATTINA eligibility criteria, a participant information sheet (PIS), considered to be the most efficient form of recruitment. One of the authors (LM) contacted patients who expressed interest and arranged interviews at a time and location convenient for them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a paucity of qualitative research examining key stakeholders’ experience and management of recurrent sore throat. This study provides a unique opportunity to triangulate the perspectives of patients, GPs and ENT staff during a feasibility study for the NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA) . The specific objectives of the NATTINA feasibility study (Reference the linked NATTINA part 2 paper submitted separately) were to establish the following: standard NHS ENT staff's willingness to randomise patients to the treatment arms; feasibility of patient identification and eligibility criteria; GPs’ willingness to refer patients to standard NHS NATTINA centres; patients’ willingness to be randomised; and views on the proposed data collection methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two additional questions were originally in the first phase of validation for the TOI 14 questionnaire. The TOI14 is being used to assess throat‐related quality of life in adults in NATTINA . The 16 items offer categorical response options graded 0 to 5 (5=most severe; 0=no problem), reflecting patients’ experience of symptoms over the previous 6 months.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our team is contributing to the UK NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA), a nationally funded trial aiming to provide level one evidence for tonsillectomy. The randomised controlled trial in adults examining tonsillectomy vs medical treatment is currently recruiting patients in the UK, but results will not be available for some years …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found one multicentre randomised controlled trial that is currently recruiting patients and is expected to complete in 2019. The National Trial of Tonsillectomy In Adults in the UK (UKCRN ID 17530, www.NATTINA.com) 12 aims to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of tonsillectomy compared with conservative management (deferred surgery) in 510 adult participants with recurrent tonsillitis. The primary outcome measure is the number of sore throat days over a 24 month period.…”
Section: Is Ongoing Research Likely To Provide Relevant Evidence?mentioning
confidence: 99%